The other thread is a dumpster fire. I'm sure this will become one as well, but might as well start with a clean slate. I'll at least try to keep the OP updated with any notable news. Feel free to PM me if I miss anything good.
Arrest warrant and potential charges:
Spoiler!
BREAKING: An arrest warrant has been issued for Kansas City Chiefs wide receiver Rashee Rice in connection to his involvement in a multi-vehicle crash on U.S. 75 in Dallas in late March, sources tell WFAA. https://t.co/XL3F7oCuW1
Originally Posted by :
Rice, 23, now faces eight charges in the case -- six counts of collision involving bodily injury, one count of collision involving serious bodily injury and one count of aggravated assault, according to the arrest warrant. All of the charges are felonies.
Collision involving injury carries a penalty of imprisonment in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice for not more than five years or confinement in the county jail for not more than one year, a fine fine not to exceed $5,000 or both. Collision involving serious bodily injury -- a third-degree felony -- carries a punishment of imprisonment in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice of not more than 10 years or less than 2 years. Aggravated assault -- a second-degree felony -- is punishable by two to 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $10,000.
TL;DR, his concern was at a 2, and now it's a 4 (out of 10). Still probably not a huge deal, but there are some concerning possibilities. Overall, though, he thinks it all gets pled down to misdemeanors, he misses a couple of games, and he writes some massive checks to those he injured.
#Chiefs WR Rashee Rice and former SMU CB Theodore Knox are being sued for $1 million by two victims of the March 30 crash in Dallas, Texas, for severe injuries, including 'trauma to the brain, lacerations to the face requiring stitches, multiple contusions about the body,… pic.twitter.com/RlDvilVLi6
#Chiefs Patrick Mahomes said he's worked with Rashee Rice throughout the offseason and will continue to do so while the legal process plays out for Rice..
Originally Posted by MahomesMagic:
YOU changed the subject first.
So if that hurts your feelings then it's on you.
As I said, try responding to the posts in the thread next time rather than random words that hurt your feelings months ago. Your response to my post was nonsensical gibberish.
The argument wasn't about impossibility but why make things harder on yourself?
Same holds true this year. Sure, we can win making Mahomes a game manager, running the ball, and playing defense but just adding one or two guys that can catch and the offense elite allows us to crush teams instead of holding on and waiting for a mistake to win by a FG.
We also won 2 SB's without going 16 straight drives in playoff games without a TD.
Winning with defense and mediocre offense in today's NFL gives you less room for error.
__________________ Emotional angry change of subject and callout for posts unrelated that made you sad months ago.
I think it's cute of you, as grown woman, to umbrella out your pencil skirt to provide uterine defilade for yourself and the CP army of candy asses that lamented the loss of the season after the first game.
The truth is, that thread was started by a screaming hormonal Karen, was constantly updated by the army of Karen's who declared the players "Utter human shit", and that Mahomes should "march into veach's office and DeMaNd better players and that the Chiefs "wasted a season of prime Mahomes".
Now, I do believe that you, in a moment of clarity, probably enlightened by your HRT, did make the point that the Chiefs were making it more difficult than it had to be.
So, I hope you and the ladies bridge club have a fine Saturday evening.
I realize that you don't understand what "changing the subject" means so I just left this here for others to see what you did.
Originally Posted by MahomesMagic:
You don't even understand the findings of DK and how they apply IRL. You are using the word and concept incorrectly.
I would ask you to be smarter but that would require you to actually understand the concept you are promoting.
Originally Posted by DaFace:
The other thread is a dumpster fire. I'm sure this will become one as well, but might as well start with a clean slate. I'll at least try to keep the OP updated with any notable news.
Lol, you're a freaking clairvoyant, sir. Please send me the lotto numbers for powerball next week. Daddy needs a new bag . . . [Reply]
The argument wasn't about impossibility but why make things harder on yourself?
Same holds true this year. Sure, we can win making Mahomes a game manager, running the ball, and playing defense but just adding one or two guys that can catch and the offense elite allows us to crush teams instead of holding on and waiting for a mistake to win by a FG.
We also won 2 SB's without going 16 straight drives in playoff games without a TD.
Winning with defense and mediocre offense in today's NFL gives you less room for error.
__________________ Emotional angry change of subject and callout for posts unrelated that made you sad months ago.
I think it's cute of you, as grown woman, to umbrella out your pencil skirt to provide uterine defilade for yourself and the CP army of candy asses that lamented the loss of the season after the first game.
The truth is, that thread was started by a screaming hormonal Karen, was constantly updated by the army of Karen's who declared the players "Utter human shit", and that Mahomes should "march into veach's office and DeMaNd better players and that the Chiefs "wasted a season of prime Mahomes".
Now, I do believe that you, in a moment of clarity, probably enlightened by your HRT, did make the point that the Chiefs were making it more difficult than it had to be.
So, I hope you and the ladies bridge club have a fine Saturday evening.
I realize that you don't understand what "changing the subject" means so I just left this here for others to see what you did.
Originally Posted by MahomesMagic:
It does NOT mean if someone thinks someone is stupid then the person who thinks the other is stupid is stupid and the other is smart.
That's quite a tangle of someones and others [Reply]
Originally Posted by MahomesMagic:
You used the concept incorrectly.
If you want to understand what Dunning-Kruger is and how it applies you will actually have to learn on your own.
It does NOT mean if someone thinks someone is stupid then the person who thinks the other is stupid is stupid and the other is smart.
That's why I said you must have learned this on Reddit or somewhere random but it is clear you don't understand it.
Serious question, is English your first language?
While I'm a typical American who only learned English, I lack the perspective of having to translate things into a native language along with meaning/context; but I do try to understand the best I can.
That seems to be the case here, where instead of applying what DK actually means to what I said, you completely misinterpreted what I said and interpreted it in a way that doesn't make any sense.
So, either that's ironically the best example of meta-DK DK I've seen, or there's a serious challenge interpreting words on a screen... but, I want to be sensitive to any language barriers and not assume things. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Bearcat:
Serious question, is English your first language?
While I'm a typical American who only learned English, I lack the perspective of having to translate things into a native language along with meaning/context; but I do try to understand the best I can.
That seems to be the case here, where instead of applying what DK actually means to what I said, you completely misinterpreted what I said and interpreted it in a way that doesn't make any sense.
So, either that's ironically the best example of meta-DK DK I've seen, or there's a serious challenge interpreting words on a screen... but, I want to be sensitive to any language barriers and not assume things.
Interesting gambit.
But no, I don’t think you understand what Dunning-Kruger findings mean OR how to apply them in real life.
And I’m no expert on the paper but IQ is not an area of expertise. It is not a discipline to work in. You are born with it.
Calling someone dumb because they think they are smarter than your buddy is not understanding the concept.
Let’s say you go fishing for the first time. You may think you are better than you are and the person teaching you may underestimate their ability but it does not follow that if the teacher thinks they are better than the student at fishing they are wrong. [Reply]
