Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud:
Dude, he was in a 4-3 scheme his entire career in NY
So what? He played 0-1 tech in Indy. He obviously can do both. He’d be a good add. More upside than Logan and younger. Money and term are the factors, not the fit nor the ability... [Reply]
Originally Posted by Superturtle:
Well, that's the reasoning that was given by the team to their local media.
It just goes to show that Ballard has no idea what he’s doing in Indy.
He signed a bunch of guys last year that didn’t help the team, hired Josh McDaniels, only to be spurned by him, and couldn’t sign any impact players in free agency again this year.
Originally Posted by Chief Northman:
So what? He played 0-1 tech in Indy. He obviously can do both. He’d be a good add. More upside than Logan and younger. Money and term are the factors, not the fit nor the ability...
You may have misinterpreted my post.
I’d take him on a 2 year deal but it’s silly to believe that he was cut because they moved from 3-4 to a 4-3, when they signed him coming from a 4-3.
There must be something else about the player that Ballard doesn’t like. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud:
It just goes to show that Ballard has no idea what he’s doing in Indy.
He signed a bunch of guys last year that didn’t help the team, hired Josh McDaniels, only to be spurned by him, and couldn’t sign any impact players in free agency again this year.
Indy is looking toxic.
No argument from me there. So far this off-season has been pathetic for them outside of the Jets trade. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Chief Northman:
Sorenson needs a post June 1 cut designation. He’ll open up 3+ million.
I agree that West and Harris can become cut casualties, but until upgrades are signed, they will remain on the roster. Same for Witzmann. I think Bailey stays unless they find a major upgrade for sensible money.
I totally get why no one wants Sorenson starting, but dang man... he is actually pretty good depth
Restructuring him would be fine, but we cant completely gut this secondary... we need to actually field a team this year
Do agree about Bailey though, he is atleast serviceable for now [Reply]
Johnathan Hankins was PFF's #3 graded DL on run defense last season. Bennie Logan was 60th. While he wasn't great as a pass rusher he graded out higher than Logan and RNR there too. He's 25.
Pay. This. Man. - @LyleGraversen
Guy can play. He’d be a great answer at our 1-Tech. [Reply]
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19: Johnathan Hankins was PFF's #3 graded DL on run defense last season. Bennie Logan was 60th. While he wasn't great as a pass rusher he graded out higher than Logan and RNR there too. He's 25.
Pay. This. Man. - @LyleGraversen
Guy can play. He’d be a great answer at our 1-Tech.
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19: Johnathan Hankins was PFF's #3 graded DL on run defense last season. Bennie Logan was 60th. While he wasn't great as a pass rusher he graded out higher than Logan and RNR there too. He's 25.
Pay. This. Man. - @LyleGraversen
Guy can play. He’d be a great answer at our 1-Tech.
Getting Hankins would mean Tanoh is just a wasted draft pick. [Reply]