Hard to say he isnt one of our better WRs performers so far. I will say he does not seem well suited in the return game but that doesn't have anything to do with being a WR.
Either way cant win em all. Cant bat 1.000. Can only bat .900, I guess. [Reply]
in case you're thinking about giving away a little cash to your loyal fans, i was never mad at ya, Chris. Always wanted Veach to give you a bag. Not a $30 million bag, but a $27 million one. If that counts, let me know, I'll send you my zelle info, Sacknation.
I am not well versed on the business side of football, but isn't it a no brainer to keep an integral part of a Super bowl team that is under contract? I get you have to posture and not get rolled by one player but the defence is solid with Chris and doesn't having a realistic chance to go back translate into mucho dinero for the franchise? Seems like it the cost/benefit ratio should pencil out. [Reply]
Originally Posted by TIED5573:
I am not well versed on the business side of football, but isn't it a no brainer to keep an integral part of a Super bowl team that is under contract? I get you have to posture and not get rolled by one player but the defence is solid with Chris and doesn't having a realistic chance to go back translate into mucho dinero for the franchise? Seems like it the cost/benefit ratio should pencil out.
"We have Andy and we have Pat. We don't need any other high-priced players on the team. Danna and Tershown can replace him at a fraction of the cost." - CP [Reply]
31 snaps, 1.5 sacks, 1 TFL, 2 QB hits and a pass breakup :-)
Chris Jones played in 31 of 64 defensive snaps against the Jaguars Sunday, including 11 as an edge rusher. He certainly made the most of the opportunities, collecting 1.5 sacks and making impact plays that fueled the Chiefs' 17-9 win in Jacksonville.https://t.co/7vYSEWVENs
Originally Posted by Megatron96:
"We have Andy and we have Pat. We don't need any other high-priced players on the team. Danna and Tershown can replace him at a fraction of the cost." - CP
But you just said they shouldn’t pay him 30mm/yr when he was looking for even more than that? So why put it on some attitude of CP as the problem? [Reply]