Originally Posted by Inmem58:
I'm starting to not like my ODB and Shepard stack. I might have to make some changes. You're looking damn good as of right now.
If you can, get Mathews in your lineup. I have a major boner for him this week.
No can do,it's FD no changes once game has started [Reply]
Entered a $1 tourney and took 12th place of 1176 and drum roll,netted $9 :-)
Tonight will be the interesting one,Sun/Mon night tourney 88,000 teams and I'm in 74th place which right now is worth $100,still have Fozzy and Olsen to go and am 10 points behind the #1 which pays $15,000.No one in front of me has a rb playing mostly a te and/or defense but it's those behind me I have no idea because I sure as hell ain't checking 87,926 entries. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Nzoner:
Entered a $1 tourney and took 12th place of 1176 and drum roll,netted $9 :-)
Tonight will be the interesting one,Sun/Mon night tourney 88,000 teams and I'm in 74th place which right now is worth $100,still have Fozzy and Olsen to go and am 10 points behind the #1 which pays $15,000.No one in front of me has a rb playing mostly a te and/or defense but it's those behind me I have no idea because I sure as hell ain't checking 87,926 entries.
That's why I stick to 50/50's. I'll put 2-3 lineups in the big tourneys. Cash games are easier to win and the lineups are easier. [Reply]
Have any of you guys won serious money with this shit?
I hit $700 on a $2 tourney in Sept '14 and nothing like it since,almost seems like a ****ing casino,hit a nice one and get your ass hooked and then sorry. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Nzoner:
Have any of you guys won serious money with this shit?
I hit $700 on a $2 tourney in Sept '14 and nothing like it since,almost seems like a ****ing casino,hit a nice one and get your ass hooked and then sorry.
I rarely get into the big tournaments, it's very rare to hit big. I play the 50/50's @ $10 a lineup. Your odds are a lot better at getting a bigger bank roll. I'll throw 1-2 $3-$4 entries into the bigger tournaments. I won't do anymore than that. [Reply]