See if KCC can continue to act like act like a twat in tomorrow’s Royals GDT? No?
Well fuck it then…. Find out where they’re registered, maybe get a good place setting or candlesticks, rub some dirt on it and let’s turn two…
I have little doubt we’ll grab another player who will play a valuable role tomorrow. And I think we have to be shortsighted, and go for a player who could potentially be a player that can honestly contribute to a Pat Trick. [Reply]
Originally Posted by GabyKeepsMeWarm:
See if KCC can continue to act like act like a twat in tomorrow’s Royals GDT? No?
And I see you're so bothered about my shit talking in Royals/Jays game threads that you're even posting about me in other football threads irrelevant to the topic now too. :-)
I have no interest at all in a Royals/Tigers game thread (or anything Royals-related at all when they're not facing the Jays), FYI. You can rest easy. [Reply]
Originally Posted by big nasty kcnut:
If you give me McCaffery or rice I would be happy. Offensive fatty too would be good.
I really want Brenden Rice. He is big, athletic, and different from every other WR on the team.
I feel like, with Mahomes, Rice could be a Pro Bowl level player. If he goes to a different QB and HC combo, who knows. I also feel like, especially lately, players with successful family members in the NFL have also been successful.
I wanted McCaffrey until we signed LRZ. Not that LRZ would make the team and play over McCaffrey, but they seem redundant. They probably aren't, but the role I wanted McCaffrey for is basically going to LRZ I think. [Reply]
Originally Posted by RunKC:
We only have one pick at 64 but 4 picks to start off day 3 with 2 in rd 4 and 2 in rd 5. They also have the extra Titans 3rd.
Sure feels like they have ammo to trade up a good deal if they really want to.
Feels like they will only have one pick tomorrow unless something major happens. If so what position would you take? Trade up for a Tackle?
DT seems like a very underrated pick to me. What do you guys think?
I would've said this before yesterday, but I'm fully on board with quality over quantity at this specific juncture, going for that 3peat and really maximizing Kelce's last couple years, Jones before any potential decline, and Hollywood on that 1-year deal. If they see a tackle there in the 40s who can start this year, whether it's LT or RT and Taylor moves over, I'm 10000% on board with that. [Reply]
My goodness, I was lectured at by someone on this forum a while back about how the Chiefs would NEVER go into the draft with a gaping hole at any position...lo and behold, we have two gaping holes at LT and CB. Either the plan is to bring Donovan Smith back or draft his replacement today. We can't go into the season with Wanya Morris protecting Mahomes' blindside. [Reply]
Bpa. Though I'd rather stack the deck with offense so that next year we can focus on defense again. Would like to start thinking about a TE and we can get value at RB. Still would help to have an extra wr body but hoping we consider a reliable vet since we need to fill the bottom instead of the top
Obviously need an OT
An underrated need is interior OL. Depth is always helpful. But I really don't want to pump so much money into a position you should be able to draft. We save tons of money moving away from trey and in the near future we want to move away from Thuney [Reply]
Originally Posted by SHOWTIME:
My goodness, I was lectured at by someone on this forum a while back about how the Chiefs would NEVER go into the draft with a gaping hole at any position...lo and behold, we have two gaping holes at LT and CB. Either the plan is to bring Donovan Smith back or draft his replacement today. We can't go into the season with Wanya Morris protecting Mahomes' blindside.
I wouldn’t call CB a gaping hole.
The secondary as a whole will still be pretty good, even without Sneed. [Reply]