Originally Posted by Cochise:
This is a really sad story about how the local community seems to have rallied around the rapists instead of the victims.
PROSECUTE THE PARENTS, PROSECUTE THE PARENTS, PROSECUTE THE PARENTS, PROSECUTE THE PARENTS,PROSECUTE THE PARENTS, PROSECUTE THE PARENTS,PROSECUTE THE PARENTS, PROSECUTE THE PARENTS,PROSECUTE THE PARENTS, PROSECUTE THE PARENTS,PROSECUTE THE PARENTS, PROSECUTE THE PARENTS,PROSECUTE THE PARENTS, PROSECUTE THE PARENTS,PROSECUTE THE PARENTS, PROSECUTE THE PARENTS,PROSECUTE THE PARENTS, PROSECUTE THE PARENTS,PROSECUTE THE PARENTS, PROSECUTE THE PARENTS,PROSECUTE THE PARENTS, PROSECUTE THE PARENTS,PROSECUTE THE PARENTS, PROSECUTE THE PARENTS,PROSECUTE THE PARENTS, PROSECUTE THE PARENTS,PROSECUTE THE PARENTS, PROSECUTE THE PARENTS,PROSECUTE THE PARENTS, PROSECUTE THE PARENTS,PROSECUTE THE PARENTS, PROSECUTE THE PARENTS,PROSECUTE THE PARENTS, PROSECUTE THE PARENTS,PROSECUTE THE PARENTS, PROSECUTE THE PARENTS,PROSECUTE THE PARENTS, PROSECUTE THE PARENTS,PROSECUTE THE PARENTS, PROSECUTE THE PARENTS,PROSECUTE THE PARENTS, PROSECUTE THE PARENTS [Reply]
At the very least making or possessing a video tape of a 13 or 14 year old girl having sex would be child pornography. High School seniors have no business banging 13 year old girls. [Reply]
I don't know anything about this case. However...whenever nearly everyone involved in a situation like this is on one side, and an article is published that makes it seem like all of those people are out of their minds...generally, there is a lot more to the story.
Is it more likely that an entire community is cool with raping a young girl OR is it more likely that a single reporter is trying to break a huge story by selectively including/omitting critical details? [Reply]
Originally Posted by Saul Good:
I don't know anything about this case. However...whenever nearly everyone involved in a situation like this is on one side, and an article is published that makes it seem like all of those people are out of their minds...generally, there is a lot more to the story.
Is it more likely that an entire community is cool with raping a young girl OR is it more likely that a single reporter is trying to break a huge story by selectively including/omitting critical details?
I would say the Sheiffs comments seem to paint a pretty good picture that they thought they had a pretty good case.. They had video/confessions/Sheriffs stating it was a air tight case. I remember hearing about this awhile back, but never heard anyone defending the rapist. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Saul Good:
I don't know anything about this case. However...whenever nearly everyone involved in a situation like this is on one side, and an article is published that makes it seem like all of those people are out of their minds...generally, there is a lot more to the story.
Is it more likely that an entire community is cool with raping a young girl OR is it more likely that a single reporter is trying to break a huge story by selectively including/omitting critical details?
This is the same area where a man was shot in broad daylight with over 30 witnesses and no one was ever prosecuted because the witnesses wouldn't speak.
Originally Posted by WhawhaWhat:
This is the same area where a man was shot in broad daylight with over 30 witnesses and no one was ever prosecuted because the witnesses wouldn't speak.
This is also the same area where a pregnant woman was kidnapped, the baby was cut out of her and the mother was left to die.
Maryville and the towns that surround it are filled with weird people.
Both of those incidents happened in Skidmore Missouri. Bobbie Jo wasn't kidnapped, but murdered in her own home. McElroy got what was coming to him from a community that was terrorized by him and his family [Reply]
Originally Posted by stonedstooge:
Both of those incidents happened in Skidmore Missouri. Bobbie Jo wasn't kidnapped, but murdered in her own home. McElroy got what was coming to him from a community that was terrorized by him and his family
So there was more to each of those stories than what a one-sided comment included? [Reply]