O.city 03:24 PM 02-05-2019
We don't really have one of these yet, so figured we could use this as a place to discuss potential free agent acquisitions and what we would like to look for them to bring in.
If any of you guys are interested, heres a good place to do some research.
https://overthecap.com/
[Reply]
MAHOMO 4 LIFE! 02:01 PM 03-11-2019
I’m fine with Watts starting. He was balling before he got hurt. I want a safety because Berry’s spirit won’t allow him to play
[Reply]
The Franchise 02:01 PM 03-11-2019
St. Patty's Fire 02:01 PM 03-11-2019
Originally Posted by TambaBerry :
Barr would absolutely dominate in Spags defense
dominant
it’s dominant
i don’t understand how so many people get this wrong
say “he would be dominate” out loud and understand how ridiculous it sounds
sorry for being a grammar nazi but that one really bothers me and i see it way too often
[Reply]
The Franchise 02:02 PM 03-11-2019
Originally Posted by JohnDONsey :
dominant
it’s dominant
i don’t understand how so many people get this wrong
say “he would be dominate” out loud and understand how ridiculous it sounds
sorry for being a grammar nazi but that one really bothers me and i see it way too often
Except it's not dominant in his sentence.
Say this sentence out loud. "Barr would absolutely dominant in Spags defense."
[Reply]
St. Patty's Fire 02:03 PM 03-11-2019
Originally Posted by The Franchise :
Except it's not dominant in his sentence.
Say this sentence out loud. "Barr would absolutely dominant in Spags defense."
i could have fucking sworn I saw “be dominate”
my bad
[Reply]
Mecca 02:03 PM 03-11-2019
Originally Posted by JohnDONsey :
dominant
it’s dominant
i don’t understand how so many people get this wrong
say “he would be dominate” out loud and understand how ridiculous it sounds
sorry for being a grammar nazi but that one really bothers me and i see it way too often
The way he used the word is ok he didn't say he would be dominate he said he would dominate...read it again.
[Reply]
CasselGotPeedOn 02:04 PM 03-11-2019
Originally Posted by The Franchise :
Except it's not dominant in his sentence.
Say this sentence out loud. "Barr would absolutely dominant in Spags defense."
:-)
[Reply]
St. Patty's Fire 02:04 PM 03-11-2019
Originally Posted by Mecca :
The way he used the word is ok he didn't say he would be dominate he said he would dominate...read it again.
yeah i fucked up and feel like a dick now
:-) move along pls
[Reply]
BossChief 02:04 PM 03-11-2019
Originally Posted by Titty Meat :
Not durable
Hasn’t missed a game since 2016
[Reply]
Kiimo 02:05 PM 03-11-2019
Look I sometimes grammar Nazi people too but man there's nothing quite like seeing someone do it and be totally wrong. It's delicious.
[Reply]
DJ's left nut 02:05 PM 03-11-2019
Originally Posted by O.city :
I kinda like Joyner. I know some don't but I'd much rather pay him what he'll get than what Collins got.
Undersized safety that lost a step last year.
When he hits the wall, he'll be completely unplayable. And there's a chance he inched pretty damn close to it in 2018.
[Reply]
Chief Roundup 02:06 PM 03-11-2019
TambaBerry 02:06 PM 03-11-2019
Originally Posted by JohnDONsey :
dominant
it’s dominant
i don’t understand how so many people get this wrong
say “he would be dominate” out loud and understand how ridiculous it sounds
sorry for being a grammar nazi but that one really bothers me and i see it way too often
Uhh dominate is the correct way
[Reply]
penchief 02:06 PM 03-11-2019
Originally Posted by JohnDONsey :
dominant
it’s dominant
i don’t understand how so many people get this wrong
say “he would be dominate” out loud and understand how ridiculous it sounds
sorry for being a grammar nazi but that one really bothers me and i see it way too often
I think an apology may be in order. Judging from what you quoted, you misread his comment. There is no 'be' in his sentence, which would make 'dominate' appropriate.
[Reply]
CasselGotPeedOn 02:07 PM 03-11-2019
Hey ChiefsandO'sfan, remember when you thought Landon Collins would get 4 years 40 million? I thought you said it was easy to predict contracts?
:-) :-) :-) :-) :-)
[Reply]