Originally Posted by Bwana:
Once again, don't come in this thread with some kind of political agenda, or you will be shown the door. If you want to go that route, there is a thread about this in DC.
Originally Posted by Dartgod:
People, there is a lot of good information in this thread, let's try to keep the petty bickering to a minimum.
We all have varying opinions about the impact of this, the numbers, etc. We will all never agree with each other. But we can all keep it civil.
Thanks!
Click here for the original OP:
Spoiler!
Apparently the CoronaVirus can survive on a inanimate objects, such as door knobs, for 9 days.
California coronavirus case could be first spread within U.S. community, CDC says
By SOUMYA KARLAMANGLA, JACLYN COSGROVE
FEB. 26, 2020 8:04 PM
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is investigating what could be the first case of novel coronavirus in the United States involving a patient in California who neither recently traveled out of the country nor was in contact with someone who did.
“At this time, the patient’s exposure is unknown. It’s possible this could be an instance of community spread of COVID-19, which would be the first time this has happened in the United States,” the CDC said in a statement. “Community spread means spread of an illness for which the source of infection is unknown. It’s also possible, however, that the patient may have been exposed to a returned traveler who was infected.”
The individual is a resident of Solano County and is receiving medical care in Sacramento County, according to the state Department of Public Health.
The CDC said the “case was detected through the U.S. public health system — picked up by astute clinicians.”
Officials at UC Davis Medical Center expanded on what the federal agency might have meant by that in an email sent Wednesday, as reported by the Davis Enterprise newspaper.
The patient arrived at UC Davis Medical Center from another hospital Feb. 19 and “had already been intubated, was on a ventilator, and given droplet protection orders because of an undiagnosed and suspected viral condition,” according to an email sent by UC Davis officials that was obtained by the Davis Enterprise.
The staff at UC Davis requested COVID-19 testing by the CDC, but because the patient didn’t fit the CDC’s existing criteria for the virus, a test wasn’t immediately administered, according to the email. The CDC then ordered the test Sunday, and results were announced Wednesday. Hospital administrators reportedly said in the email that despite these issues, there has been minimal exposure at the hospital because of safety protocols they have in place.
A UC Davis Health spokesperson declined Wednesday evening to share the email with The Times.
Since Feb. 2, more than 8,400 returning travelers from China have entered California, according to the state health department. They have been advised to self-quarantine for 14 days and limit interactions with others as much as possible, officials said.
“This is a new virus, and while we are still learning about it, there is a lot we already know,” Dr. Sonia Angell, director of the California Department of Public Health, said in a statement. “We have been anticipating the potential for such a case in the U.S., and given our close familial, social and business relationships with China, it is not unexpected that the first case in the U.S. would be in California.”
It is not clear how the person became infected, but public health workers could not identify any contacts with people who had traveled to China or other areas where the virus is widespread. That raises concern that the virus is spreading in the United States, creating a challenge for public health officials, experts say.
“It’s the first signal that we could be having silent transmission in the community,” said Lawrence Gostin, director of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law. “It probably means there are many more cases out there, and it probably means this individual has infected others, and now it’s a race to try to find out who that person has infected.”
On Tuesday, the CDC offered its most serious warning to date that the United States should expect and prepare for the coronavirus to become a more widespread health issue.
“Ultimately, we expect we will see coronavirus spread in this country,” said Nancy Messonnier, director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. “It’s not so much a question of if, but a question of when.”
According to the CDC’s latest count Wednesday morning, 59 U.S. residents have tested positive for the new strain of coronavirus — 42 of whom are repatriated citizens from a Diamond Princess cruise. That number has grown by two since Messonnier’s last count Tuesday, although the CDC was not immediately available to offer details on the additional cases.
More than 82,000 cases of coronavirus have been reported globally, and more than 2,700 people have died, with the majority in mainland China, the epicenter of the outbreak.
But public health leaders have repeatedly reminded residents that the health risk from the novel coronavirus to the general public remains low.
“While COVID-19 has a high transmission rate, it has a low mortality rate,” the state Department of Public Health said in a statement Wednesday. “From the international data we have, of those who have tested positive for COVID-19, approximately 80% do not exhibit symptoms that would require hospitalization. There have been no confirmed deaths related to COVID-19 in the United States to date.”
CDC officials have also warned that although the virus is likely to spread in U.S. communities, the flu still poses a greater risk.
Gostin said the news of potential silent transmission does not eliminate the possibility of containing the virus in the U.S. and preventing an outbreak.
“There are few enough cases that we should at least try,” he said. “Most of us are not optimistic that that will be successful, but we’re still in the position to try.”
The South Korean breakdown of their children study is a prime reason why we need to have these setup well and break them down well.
It’s why Hamas was right about how they should be setup
They found one household transmission of a kid to another and it was a 16 year old to a 14 year old. They found most of the infections were brought in to the house by the adult (97%) and that of the 3% that came from the kid they had a shared exposure. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DaFace:
They're actually more comfortable, too, IMO. They seem a bit more breathable even though they do a good job of filtering droplets.
Guess there's a reason they use them for surgery...
I only tried one cloth and I found it more suffocating because it hugged my face/mouth more , worn long term I think would get moist faster putting wearer at more risk. [Reply]
A few weeks ago a study from SK got lots of attention for reportedly showed children aged 10 - 19 were just as, or more infectious than adults with #COVID19
Originally Posted by petegz28:
So here is some data I choose to interpret as we are getting better at treating this thing...
The top 3 states in cases still have a combined death count of 5,500ish less than NY who is #4 in cases overall.
CA, FL & TX have almost 4 times as many cases and only 2/3 of the death of NY alone.
Woah, woah, woah....slow down there, Pete. That is a pretty dangerous slippery slope you're on there; next thing you know, you'll be spouting some really crazy shit like, "Welp, apparently science works" and "Maybe we should listen to the scientists."
As you know, we just can't have that type of thinking here on CP because it leads to social distancing, hand washing, and mask wearing. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DaFace:
2977/285 million = 0.00001%
Is this where people jump in to say it’s not contagious like RonAids, or is that still only applying to heart disease etc? Maybe I misunderstand when to use the “it’s not contagious” argument. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Fat Elvis:
Woah, woah, woah....slow down there, Pete. That is a pretty dangerous slippery slope you're on there; next thing you know, you'll be spouting some really crazy shit like, "Welp, apparently science works" and "Maybe we should listen to the scientists."
As you know, we just can't have that type of thinking here on CP because it leads to social distancing, hand washing, and mask wearing.
I know you think you're being clever but perhaps you should read things a little more slowly. Or is your argument that social distancing increases cases but reduces deaths? Seems that's not how that is supposed to work but you're the expert. [Reply]
Originally Posted by mac459:
Is this where people jump in to say it’s not contagious like RonAids, or is that still only applying to heart disease etc? Maybe I misunderstand when to use the “it’s not contagious” argument.
Guess I've missed that argument. What's the point they're trying to make? [Reply]