Originally Posted by the steam:
Reid needs to be gone. 1-5 now in conference championship games. Was the favorite in 4 of them, just not a big game coach.
May have to do that to get rid of Sutton.
Andy will not fire him.
Only hope is that Sutton retires and put Andy on notice, as he has enough time to get it right. [Reply]
Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88:
Clark needs to intervene if Andy refuses to "retire" Sutton.
He better. If he cares about the fan base. I still say the KC media needs to turn up the heat for this to happen. We need a new look on defense. [Reply]
Everyone knew that they were going to Edelman on third down and Sutton didn’t do anything to stop it. Meanwhile the Pats doubled Hill and basically eliminated him from the game. [Reply]
As he should feel it because he refuses to address the Sutton/lack of defensive talent issue.:-)
Andy is correct that IT IS very difficult to win conference championships BUT it makes it even MORE DIFFICULT when you don't have D talent let alone a D coord who doesn't make adjustments. And to make those adjustments you need talent. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mecca:
I feel like Andy Reid is way more interested in being a buddy to his coaching staff than making good decisions.
Quality post.
And Andy is paired up with an owner who'd rather lose than not be friends of his players. It really starts with Clark, he sets the tone and allows all of this no ice in the veins, not-like-the-Pats, bullshit. [Reply]
And Andy is paired up with an owner who'd rather lose than not be friends of his players. It really starts with Clark, he sets the tone and allows all of this no ice in the veins, not-like-the-Pats, bullshit.
You would think that the Pats after 9 SB appearances in such a short time would be friends with players and Hunt with 50 years of irrelevance would be more ruthless and desperate to win at all costs! [Reply]