We don't really have one of these yet, so figured we could use this as a place to discuss potential free agent acquisitions and what we would like to look for them to bring in.
If any of you guys are interested, heres a good place to do some research.
Originally Posted by MotherfuckerJones:
Catching up on this thread. Some bleeding vaginas lol. That gun guy got the Watkins deal down to the numbers. He’s got some insider sources.
Lol it was 1 thing he got right. Even if he had a source for that, he hasn't proven he has consistent sources it that it wasn't just a good guess [Reply]
Originally Posted by -King-:
Lol it was 1 thing he got right. Even if he had a source for that, he hasn't proven he has consistent sources it that it wasn't just a good guess
Nobody in the business has consistent sources. They're all wrong a lot more often than they're right. It's the nature of it all. [Reply]
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
Nobody in the business has consistent sources. They're all wrong a lot more often than they're right. It's the nature of it all.
OL market isn’t only one booming. A lot of interest in LBs who can cover. Broncos LB Brandon Marshall, who will have his option declined soon, has recieved interest from 5 teams including 2 AFC playoff teams, per source, but keep a close eye on the Cardinals here.
OL market isn’t only one booming. A lot of interest in LBs who can cover. Broncos LB Brandon Marshall, who will have his option declined soon, has recieved interest from 5 teams including 2 AFC playoff teams, per source, but keep a close eye on the Cardinals here.
Originally Posted by saphojunkie:
100%. I probably should have prefaced that. I would be an infuriating GM, because I would almost NEVER pay a premium for home-grown players. Every single time the fans posted a "pay that man his money" gif, you could all but guarantee that dude is wearing a different jersey next season.
My trades would come down to whether or not I think the comp pick would be higher, and that's that. Cold blooded.
I think it's the only way to field a truly great team around a franchise QB. It's how you have extended excellence. Great college scouting + multiple throws at the dart board.
I can see the pats model for guys like Chandler Jones but it’s not going to just work for any team. Definitely have to be smart/smarter with having a top qb on his rookie contract. I don’t know I guess I can see it many different ways depending on many different things. Just got to be flexible. [Reply]
Originally Posted by -King-:
Lol it was 1 thing he got right. Even if he had a source for that, he hasn't proven he has consistent sources it that it wasn't just a good guess
Chris, go look at a guy like Jason LaConfora and his shit he’s gotten wrong. [Reply]
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
Nobody in the business has consistent sources. They're all wrong a lot more often than they're right. It's the nature of it all.
That's nowhere near true lol. The reason terez is trusted us because he's almost always right. [Reply]
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
You can think that, and you'd be wrong.
I didn't want Berry cut, I didn't want Houston cut. I literally don't care what they do with those two.
I care about them tagging and playing Dee Ford because it's a bad idea. Plain and simple. This team can win a Super Bowl in 2019. Using that much cap on one player that has never proven anything in his entire career is simply not a risk I want them to take.
Last year, he lead all edge guys in pressures, FFs and was towards the top in sacks. [Reply]
