Originally Posted by Mecca:
He was out there in the 3rd, not sure about the 4th.
You may be right - that game was interminably long and at some point I just took to actually watching paint dry instead so it's possible that by the 4th I'd completely tuned out and was thinking 3rd.
In either event, he was in after Niemann.
Again - not great news for him. Probably pretty good news for the Chiefs, though. He's just not mobile enough. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut:
You may be right - that game was interminably long and at some point I just took to actually watching paint dry instead so it's possible that by the 4th I'd completely tuned out and was thinking 3rd.
In either event, he was in after Niemann.
Again - not great news for him. Probably pretty good news for the Chiefs, though. He's just not mobile enough.
I think he was playing on the outside in the second half, Darron Lee also played a ton, I'm at the point that at the LB spot other than Hitchens I think they are trying to figure out what they have. [Reply]
Originally Posted by O.city:
So you've got Hitch, Lee, Nieman, dude from Dallas who's name I don't remember, then what?
Wilson.
And after those 4 I'm not sure I'm happy to see ANY of them on the field. As the pre-season has progressed I've become more and more confident that the top of our LB corps is gonna be fine. And more and more confident that everyone behind them is garbage.
I mean even when DoD got through the line clean, he blew the tackle and had to run the guy down a couple yards past the LOS. We have some developmental guy who's name I don't recall who's existed but that's about it. Everything else is pure chaff. [Reply]
Yeah I’m thinking we trade for a LB to be a primary backup.
Ragland is just too slow and Neimann is very weak at the point of attack. It was painful watching Ragland run as slow as Speaks and Neimann getting pushed back 5 yards consistently. [Reply]
And after those 4 I'm not sure I'm happy to see ANY of them on the field. As the pre-season has progressed I've become more and more confident that the top of our LB corps is gonna be fine. And more and more confident that everyone behind them is garbage.
I mean even when DoD got through the line clean, he blew the tackle and had to run the guy down a couple yards past the LOS. We have some developmental guy who's name I don't recall who's existed but that's about it. Everything else is pure chaff.
I've liked what Attachou has done at SLB, but Wilson has been just good there.
So i'm gonna guess you've got Hitchens, Lee, Wilson, Nieman, Attachou and maybe some waiver claims? [Reply]
Originally Posted by RunKC:
Yeah I’m thinking we trade for a LB to be a primary backup.
Ragland is just too slow and Neimann is very weak at the point of attack. It was painful watching Ragland run as slow as Speaks and Neumann getting pushed back 5 yards consistently.
I just don't know where you see Nieman being so bad. [Reply]
Are they trying to hide Custis? I don't remember him doing anything except catch a short pass against the Bengals, though, admittedly, I've missed big chunks of both games because NFLN sucks. [Reply]
Originally Posted by O.city:
I've liked what Attachou has done at SLB, but Wilson has been just good there.
So i'm gonna guess you've got Hitchens, Lee, Wilson, Nieman, Attachou and maybe some waiver claims?
Ah, I always forget about Attachou. But he's less of a backup than he is a situational use guy.
I still badly want DoD to make the team because I think he can still replace Lee next season. But he's just done so damn little to suggest he should.
I think I'd roll with 6 right now and that 6 would include DoD, but I'd be looking for a replacement for sure. If a solid candidate emerges on the cut list, I think DoD has used up his equity with me. [Reply]