Chiefs Frank Clark to KC! - Page 25

Sources: The #Seahawks and #Chiefs are deep in talks on a trade to send star Frank Clark to KC. The compensation would include a 1st rounder, a 2020 2nd rounder and a swap of mid-rounders. To complete it, the franchise tagged player and Chiefs must hammer out a deal.
— Ian Rapoport (@RapSheet) April 23, 2019

[Reply]

Originally Posted by Mecca:
Seriously lets look back...the Vikings gave us more for Jared Allen..would anyone do that trade again?

Jamaal Charles was a damn good out of that. Albert was solid. That would be a tough one.
[Reply]

@TheRealFrankC_ let’s �� gooooooooooo!!!!! Welcome to @Chiefs ....#ChiefsKingdom #Sacknation #SacksUp
— Chris Jones (@stonecoldjones_) April 23, 2019

[Reply]

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE!:

Frank Clark is a very violent football player. That’s a good thing the Chiefs got a dog
— Jeff Allen (@JeffAllen71) April 23, 2019

That's something this D has been missing aside from Sorenson (whose routine mediocreness nullifies it).
[Reply]

Originally Posted by JakeF:
Don't forget Houston. We could have kept Houston and tagged Ford for a year, along with our 1st round pick this year and 2nd next year.

Clark's value needs to be better than Houston,Ford, and a 1st round pick.

Are you mental? Houston was going to cost $22 million or something. Dee Ford was going to coast $17 million.

A #29 pick was not going to wreck worlds right out of the gate.

You're not really this stupid are you?
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Detoxing:
And had that video not surfaced, he would still be a Chief.

Players caught on video assaulting women get cut. That's the NFL. The Chiefs did nothing that any other team wouldn't have done.

Disagree. Cleveland, apparently, is absolutely cool with it and is ascending.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Marcellus:
https://sports.yahoo.com/chiefs-clos...174749870.html

Terez Paylor's take on it.

The part about adding talent through the draft is where Veach is going to run into trouble.
[Reply]

Some of this fan base has become really use to having Jags,
[Reply]

Honest questions.

What would you have given up to move to the top 15 in this draft? Would this year’s first and next year’s second be too much?

If you did that and drafted exactly Frank Clark, would you be satisfied with the pick?
[Reply]

Originally Posted by JakeF:
Ok. So Frank Clark is worth as much as Houston,Ford and a 1st round pick? Impressive.

You mean the one trick pony Ford, and the declining Houston who we were paying a ton to?
[Reply]

Originally Posted by tooge:
Wait, what? A 1st and one of our 2nd round picks for this guy? That's like what you give up to get a total stud. I admit I don't watch much of the NFC, but is this guy that good? C'mon CP, sell this deal to me. PLEASE

HE A STUD
[Reply]

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry:
Jamaal Charles was a damn good out of that. Albert was solid. That would be a tough one.

Jamaal was the Chiefs' first of the three 3rd round picks. Would have likely been available at the Chiefs pick at 76. Allen was essentially traded for Albert, Morgan, and Cottam
[Reply]

Veach'd

Someone within the KC organization is working on yet another Mahomes/Veach propaganda piece.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by smithandrew051:
Honest questions.

What would you have given up to move to the top 15 in this draft? Would this year’s first and next year’s second be too much?

If you did that and drafted exactly Frank Clark, would you be satisfied with the pick?

It would take more than that to get into the Top 15...
[Reply]

I think most would, although I would have preferred to stay at 29. I think the contract is a big part of it in that it prevents us from using that money to acquire/keep other needed talent.

That being said, I'm ok with the trade. We still have holes to fill, though.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Mecca:
Some of this fan base has become really use to having Jags,

There's people who hate this move but loved having Eric Hicks as a starter. Logic left Chiefs Kingdom decades ago.
[Reply]