The @NFLPA just released their player team report cards for 2024 and the results are ... suboptimal for the Chiefs.
Head coach Andy Reid gets A+ but Chiefs rank dead last in training staff and ownership. Ownership gets an F- from the players. pic.twitter.com/2XyHkQfFru
Originally Posted by stevieray:
It's an extremely tangible way to honor the Championship.
SF players earned 89k.
Right, because they beat the other guys.
Again, that’s not a flex for ownership. Our players earned the higher pay bonus and they earned their Super Bowl winner rings.
This collection of guys just won back-to-back Super Bowls, a feat that hasn’t been achieved in 20 years (longer if you don’t count those cheating sacks of shit in New England). In the process, they’ve probably added tens of millions of dollars in equity and cash to this organization. We can offer them an updated practice locker room and some fucking on-site daycare on game days. [Reply]
Originally Posted by ThaVirus:
Right, because they beat the other guys.
Again, that’s not a flex for ownership. Our players earned the higher pay bonus and they earned their Super Bowl winner rings.
This collection of guys just won back-to-back Super Bowls, a feat that hasn’t been achieved in 20 years (longer if you don’t count those cheating sacks of shit in New England). In the process, they’ve probably added tens of millions of dollars in equity and cash to this organization. We can offer them an updated practice locker room and some ****ing on-site daycare on game days.
So? The 49ers also brought money to their organization. Those Rings go up in value, whereas the money just gets spent.
The Chiefs aren't responsible for babysitting children, parents are.
“So?” he says, after I’ve just made my point as clearly as possible.. lol
Funny you mention the 9ers, though. They’re not a dynasty or the current reigning Super Bowl champs like KC.. in fact, they haven’t won a Super Bowl ring in 30 years.. and yet their ownership was rated an A-. That should really squash this stupid ass argument you guys keep making (who am I kidding?).
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
Interesting how some posters think the players should get free shit just because.
1) They should have already had it
2) They win 3, not 2, not 1 Super Bowls and they still have such terrible practice facilities. If anything they EARNED more.
3) It's one of the worst facilities in the NFL
The players deserve to grade Clark Hunt and the Kansas City Cheaps this way. They have all the right in the world. Clark is being cheap. Period. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BWillie:
1) They should have already had it
2) They win 3, not 2, not 1 Super Bowls and they still have such terrible practice facilities. If anything they EARNED more.
3) It's one of the worst facilities in the NFL
The players deserve to grade Clark Hunt and the Kansas City Cheaps this way. They have all the right in the world. Clark is being cheap. Period.
Fuck them. They make plenty. Greedy bastards that will go to the highest bidder the way it is. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BWillie:
1) They should have already had it
2) They win 3, not 2, not 1 Super Bowls and they still have such terrible practice facilities. If anything they EARNED more.
3) It's one of the worst facilities in the NFL
The players deserve to grade Clark Hunt and the Kansas City Cheaps this way. They have all the right in the world. Clark is being cheap. Period.
So what's your reasoning as to why Clark SHOULDN'T spend some of the massive windfalls he's received by players winning the Superbowl to upgrade the facilities that players don't like and find outdated? [Reply]
Originally Posted by -King-:
So what's your reasoning as to why Clark SHOULDN'T spend some of the massive windfalls he's received by players winning the Superbowl to upgrade the facilities that players don't like and find outdated?
Because there's a certain dollar amount we reach where they are no longer people, merely a product, and they should all shut up and accept what's given. [Reply]
Originally Posted by -King-:
So what's your reasoning as to why Clark SHOULDN'T spend some of the massive windfalls he's received by players winning the Superbowl to upgrade the facilities that players don't like and find outdated?