Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501:
If we don't take care of it, the NFL will. If we keep him under his current contract, he'll be suspended by the NFL for most of it. If we extend him, we are giving a mega deal to a player who is one dumb decision away (and we now know that that dumb decision is not as unlikely as we previously thought) from getting paid millions only to get suspended again or worse.
I'm sorry to say... But this is lose lose for the Chiefs.
I say let the NFL deal with it. Last time Clark dealt with it, Roger hid under a rock then gave an 8 game suspension when the frenzy settled down.
Kareem is probably punished more if the Chiefs didn’t make it easier for Rog. [Reply]
Ah ... that explains the confusion. That isn't the same video. The one in the OP is different. Shorter. More edited. The phrase Mr. SAUTO (among others) have been referencing is not included in the OP tape.
I have to agree ... that's not a very nice thing to say to one's beloved fiance, the mother of one's child, and future wife, is it?
Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower:
I think she wanted to use his criminal history
He doesn't have a "criminal history".
The previous incident between them?
He was given an SIS (Suspended Imposition of Sentence), complied with all terms imposed by the court, and after he served his probationary term, the incident was removed from his record. [Reply]
Originally Posted by rabblerouser:
He doesn't have a "criminal history".
The previous incident between them?
He was given an SIS (Suspended Imposition of Sentence), complied with all terms imposed by the court, and after he served his probationary term, the incident was removed from his record.
Fine. Legally he wasn't a criminal but he's understood as a criminal in the eyes of the public.
Same shit with Michael Vick. Whatever. Doesn't matter. [Reply]
"I rode for you against that detective and the CPS people, and they said, literally, time and time again, that ________ kept saying, 'Daddy punches me,' which you do when he starts crying. What do you do? You make him open up his arms and you punch him in the chest. And then if he gets in trouble you get the belt out."
"Ok, so what about you? What you going to do?"
At that point, he accuses her of using a belt too. He never denies punching his kid or hitting him with a belt. It's altogether likely that she beats him too and they are both violent people. But her personal failings do not excuse Hill's. They should both be prosecuted.
Do any of you have children? If someone accused you of beating one of them with a belt and you didn't, your first reaction would be to ask the other parent what they did if you know you didn't do it? [Reply]
Originally Posted by In58men:
Chiefs need to release him.
Clark is probably being nice and not releasing him until after the draft to not cause more controversy. Expect your stooge owner to release day after the draft because Roger asked nicely. [Reply]