Originally Posted by Bwana:
Once again, don't come in this thread with some kind of political agenda, or you will be shown the door. If you want to go that route, there is a thread about this in DC.
Originally Posted by Dartgod:
People, there is a lot of good information in this thread, let's try to keep the petty bickering to a minimum.
We all have varying opinions about the impact of this, the numbers, etc. We will all never agree with each other. But we can all keep it civil.
Thanks!
Click here for the original OP:
Spoiler!
Apparently the CoronaVirus can survive on a inanimate objects, such as door knobs, for 9 days.
California coronavirus case could be first spread within U.S. community, CDC says
By SOUMYA KARLAMANGLA, JACLYN COSGROVE
FEB. 26, 2020 8:04 PM
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is investigating what could be the first case of novel coronavirus in the United States involving a patient in California who neither recently traveled out of the country nor was in contact with someone who did.
“At this time, the patient’s exposure is unknown. It’s possible this could be an instance of community spread of COVID-19, which would be the first time this has happened in the United States,” the CDC said in a statement. “Community spread means spread of an illness for which the source of infection is unknown. It’s also possible, however, that the patient may have been exposed to a returned traveler who was infected.”
The individual is a resident of Solano County and is receiving medical care in Sacramento County, according to the state Department of Public Health.
The CDC said the “case was detected through the U.S. public health system — picked up by astute clinicians.”
Officials at UC Davis Medical Center expanded on what the federal agency might have meant by that in an email sent Wednesday, as reported by the Davis Enterprise newspaper.
The patient arrived at UC Davis Medical Center from another hospital Feb. 19 and “had already been intubated, was on a ventilator, and given droplet protection orders because of an undiagnosed and suspected viral condition,” according to an email sent by UC Davis officials that was obtained by the Davis Enterprise.
The staff at UC Davis requested COVID-19 testing by the CDC, but because the patient didn’t fit the CDC’s existing criteria for the virus, a test wasn’t immediately administered, according to the email. The CDC then ordered the test Sunday, and results were announced Wednesday. Hospital administrators reportedly said in the email that despite these issues, there has been minimal exposure at the hospital because of safety protocols they have in place.
A UC Davis Health spokesperson declined Wednesday evening to share the email with The Times.
Since Feb. 2, more than 8,400 returning travelers from China have entered California, according to the state health department. They have been advised to self-quarantine for 14 days and limit interactions with others as much as possible, officials said.
“This is a new virus, and while we are still learning about it, there is a lot we already know,” Dr. Sonia Angell, director of the California Department of Public Health, said in a statement. “We have been anticipating the potential for such a case in the U.S., and given our close familial, social and business relationships with China, it is not unexpected that the first case in the U.S. would be in California.”
It is not clear how the person became infected, but public health workers could not identify any contacts with people who had traveled to China or other areas where the virus is widespread. That raises concern that the virus is spreading in the United States, creating a challenge for public health officials, experts say.
“It’s the first signal that we could be having silent transmission in the community,” said Lawrence Gostin, director of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law. “It probably means there are many more cases out there, and it probably means this individual has infected others, and now it’s a race to try to find out who that person has infected.”
On Tuesday, the CDC offered its most serious warning to date that the United States should expect and prepare for the coronavirus to become a more widespread health issue.
“Ultimately, we expect we will see coronavirus spread in this country,” said Nancy Messonnier, director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. “It’s not so much a question of if, but a question of when.”
According to the CDC’s latest count Wednesday morning, 59 U.S. residents have tested positive for the new strain of coronavirus — 42 of whom are repatriated citizens from a Diamond Princess cruise. That number has grown by two since Messonnier’s last count Tuesday, although the CDC was not immediately available to offer details on the additional cases.
More than 82,000 cases of coronavirus have been reported globally, and more than 2,700 people have died, with the majority in mainland China, the epicenter of the outbreak.
But public health leaders have repeatedly reminded residents that the health risk from the novel coronavirus to the general public remains low.
“While COVID-19 has a high transmission rate, it has a low mortality rate,” the state Department of Public Health said in a statement Wednesday. “From the international data we have, of those who have tested positive for COVID-19, approximately 80% do not exhibit symptoms that would require hospitalization. There have been no confirmed deaths related to COVID-19 in the United States to date.”
CDC officials have also warned that although the virus is likely to spread in U.S. communities, the flu still poses a greater risk.
Gostin said the news of potential silent transmission does not eliminate the possibility of containing the virus in the U.S. and preventing an outbreak.
“There are few enough cases that we should at least try,” he said. “Most of us are not optimistic that that will be successful, but we’re still in the position to try.”
Originally Posted by Pants:
Well, would it be safe to assume that "gray area" is the same as saying there's a "CHANCE" wearing a mask can help then? If that's the case and you agree with that, I think it's self-evident the choice to not wear a mask is potentially harmful and very selfish.
You're not perpetually asymptomatic. That's not how the virus works. There's a chance you may have it and not know for a while. That being the case, you just wear a mask to be on the safe side. It's that simple, pete.
Until when? You guys and this selfish kick are cracking me up because we had thousands and thousands of people, including children dying every year from the flu and I will lay $'s to donuts that not only did you not wear a mask, I bet you were going to work knowing you had something only to spread it to others.
Enter corona virus and suddenly everyone now cares...... [Reply]
Despite what is said about surface transmission I’m still putting a glove on to touch the card pad in stores. I sanitized my hands after touching those all the time anyways in the past. [Reply]
Originally Posted by petegz28:
And there you go. The masks people wear have gaps and your eyes and ears are still exposed. As in the article I posted plus others and you most likely already know, the virus will find the path of least resistance. All the mask does is buy you an additional though minimal amount of time you can be close and talking with someone. That's about it. It doesn't prevent the virus from getting in the air. It doesn't protect your eyes or ears either.
To me it just seems that while it does provide an minimal amount of protection it is largely a psychological security.
I have a tendency to get very sore ears when I get sick, especially when I get a cold. I had doctors tell me throughout my life that my ears are the culprit and to make sure I don't over-clean then in the cold\flu season.
Point is, your mouth and nose are not the only ways to get the virus. And even with these masks people are wearing they are still not protecting your mouth and nose like you think. I have read article after article and heard doctor after doctor state just that as well.
your mouth and nose suck air and droplets in from around them and then dispel that air and those droplets back out for others to inhale.
when did your eyes and ears do that?
if you cant see the difference and why the odds would be greater of contracting it one way than the other then im not sure what to tell you [Reply]
I’m wondering if the asymptomatic people walking around with N95 masks are getting as much hate as those with no masks. The CDC specifically states to save the N95 masks for those who needed it but a bunch of neurotic idiots went out and bought them off the shelves anyways. I know BWillie posted in another thread that he thinks N95’s should be mandatory for everyone. Are these kinds people getting the equal share of the blame keeping them out of the hands of front line workers? Both the over-reactors and the under-reactors should feel ashamed of themselves at this point. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Lzen:
It is possible to feel a little nervous that the govt is encroaching on our rights but at the same time feel that some of this has been necessary, at least at first. I have seen some people criticizing our KS governor. I don't always agree with the way she has handled things during this but, I think she's doing the best she can.
But I hope you're right in that someday we'll look back and laugh and wonder why we reacted to things the way we did.
I hope so too. As Gottlieb (I think) said early on, if the measures we're taking to fight the coronavirus work, they'll look excessive later on.
Personally I'd prefer that over the alternative. [Reply]
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15:
32k posts in, and some are still comparing this to the ****ing flu.
I think there was a paper/article from Stanford comparing it to the flu. Was posted by someone last night, but it didn't get a lot of attention from what I saw. [Reply]
Originally Posted by petegz28:
So it's okay to spread the flu because what? Not as many people die? Or you just don't give a fuck if people die from the flu?
Originally Posted by petegz28:
So then you will wear a mask until you die? Your choice, obviously. Let me ask you this though, before this, how often did you wear a mask so say an elderly person at the store wouldn't catch your cold or flu?
I will continue wearing one for a while. I can't say for how long, exactly. Certainly not the rest of my life as the one person suggested. At some point, this will go away or be minimized or herd immunity will have taken hold. [Reply]
