There is really no reason for me to drop $115.99 on the full mlb.tv package when i can just subscribe to the Cardinals one for $89.99 is there? The only other team i ever watch is the Royals and i can always get them on local cable.
(I guess it doesn't include mlb At Bat on my phone) [Reply]
Originally Posted by BDj23:
There is really no reason for me to drop $115.99 on the full mlb.tv package when i can just subscribe to the Cardinals one for $89.99 is there? The only other team i ever watch is the Royals and i can always get them on local cable.
(I guess it doesn't include mlb At Bat on my phone)
i’m on Fios. It’s the extra innings package or nothing.
I don’t watch anything but the Cardinals games. I’ll tune in if l see on social media something is happening, no hitter, milestone etc
The mlb online is cheaper and then you can multicast it to the TV if your TV and pc has the capability. [Reply]
Completely putting aside the fact that Holland was downright terrible last year after the first couple of months, this signing makes no sense to me.
We have a bunch of good young bullpen arms that deserve a chance. We could have given that money to Lance Lynn or another starter that would help this team.
Originally Posted by dls6501:
Completely putting aside the fact that Holland was downright terrible last year after the first couple of months, this signing makes no sense to me.
We have a bunch of good young bullpen arms that deserve a chance. We could have given that money to Lance Lynn or another starter that would help this team.
I dont get it guys.
I don't mind the attempt, but why not wait a little longer, the price just keeps going down. It tells me they have some urgency though, because Reyes is back after May 1st giving them even more heat in the late innings. If Holland has a typical bounce back from TJ in the second year we could actually have a pretty deep and flexible pen. [Reply]
