Originally Posted by RunKC:
McConkey, Wilson and Pearsall are all similar type of WR’s to me. They represent what I think Andy wants: a smart route runner with athleticism that can win in the intermediate and threaten deep. That would fit nicely here.
Hasn’t had that type of guy since Jeremy Maclin
Johnny Wilson is a TE in the pros, his FSU teammate Keon Coleman is the WCO WR prototype. [Reply]
Originally Posted by kcgreene:
This is the one argument that I see that makes me double-take. His offense was very much centered around other things, but I still have to think that he should have more production than hes had. Personally, I have him as a Rd 3 grade to me currently. But if there's one position that booms or busts in the NFL more than any other, it's probably WR, so who the hell knows?
He was playing in the SEC with Brock Bowers as the main target. They spread the ball all over the place with all their talent when you look at their stats. Again, He is the most plug and play in our draft slot, and that's what we need. He would be a slight reach at 32 and ideal early 2nd if we get that for Sneed. Again, this assumes we get a field stretcher in FA. [Reply]
Sources: The #Chargers are releasing WR Mike Williams, making him a free agent. Williams, on the books for a $32M cap hit, becomes a top FA WR available. pic.twitter.com/4f2EMNH8Fp
Originally Posted by MahomesMagic:
Yes, there are multiple facets and you are too obsessed with how they are used in college.
I'm concerned about a lack of production in a program that has good coaching and success, so I can't pin it on bad coaching or him being asked to do what isn't his forte'.
If you want to draft players and you're not looking at how they are used in college, then you aren't being rational, because I can guarantee you scouts are looking at these things and asking questions to coaches on why they used players in certain ways constantly.
I'm not obsessed with his production, it is a big red flag though, and if you don't treat it as such, you're not being intellectually honest.
Though, I've seen your posts, and there's a reason many have you on ignore. [Reply]
Originally Posted by kcgreene:
I'm concerned about a lack of production in a program that has good coaching and success, so I can't pin it on bad coaching or him being asked to do what isn't his forte'.
If you want to draft players and you're not looking at how they are used in college, then you aren't being rational, because I can guarantee you scouts are looking at these things and asking questions to coaches on why they used players in certain ways constantly.
I'm not obsessed with his production, it is a big red flag though, and if you don't treat it as such, you're not being intellectually honest.
Though, I've seen your posts, and there's a reason many have you on ignore.
You're not listening.
Of course I care how they are used.
If you want to be a crybaby don't reply to me.
Go find a safe space.
But I am not dropping a good player 2 rounds because he is on a loaded roster vs a player not anywhere close who is focal on a team with no one else. [Reply]
Originally Posted by IowaHawkeyeChief:
He was playing in the SEC with Brock Bowers as the main target. They spread the ball all over the place with all their talent when you look at their stats. Again, He is the most plug and play in our draft slot, and that's what we need. He would be a slight reach at 32 and ideal early 2nd if we get that for Sneed. Again, this assumes we get a field stretcher in FA.
I get the argument, and I think there's merit, but personally I still think in this draft class of WRs if he is comparative to the other first round talents, we should've seen more production.
I won't be mad if we take him in the 2nd by any means. I just don't think he's gonna be as good as several others do. If we end up taking him though, I genuinely hope I'm wrong. [Reply]
Originally Posted by kcgreene:
I get the argument, and I think there's merit, but personally I still think in this draft class of WRs if he is comparative to the other first round talents, we should've seen more production.
I won't be mad if we take him in the 2nd by any means. I just don't think he's gonna be as good as several others do. If we end up taking him though, I genuinely hope I'm wrong.
What's your board?
Who are the better WR talents you are worried we will pass up? [Reply]
