Or they post stuff as a joke since there is an entire page of the same quote. :-)
[Reply]

I mean does it even matter. We were #1 in sacks this year and our defense was still ass. Clearly there's more to a competent defense than sacks.
[Reply]

I wasn’t necessarily referring to you
[Reply]

This! Not allowing 5 yards a carry on the ground would be an improvement.


I think the Chiefs go Run stopping D-line in the first round.

I think Baily is done here.
[Reply]

I don't think Ford is a good fit for them. I can't see him hanging by his toes from a cave ceiling and getting much burst. :-)
[Reply]

I think everyone is so starved for news- the same things keep getting recycled.
[Reply]

Have we cut Eric Berry yet?

For the love of all things holy, Chiefs. Do NOT fuck this up. You cannot keep that friggen clown.
[Reply]

Weren't Ford and Houston out last year vs the Pats?
[Reply]

If I'm the Packers, I offer to pick swap in the second and throw in a fourth for Dee Ford.

Packers get: Ford and Pick 63
Chiefs get: Pick 44, Pick 119

— Peter Bukowski (@Peter_Bukowski) March 9, 2019

[Reply]

:-) :-)

How about go fuck yourself Peter?
[Reply]

:-) get that shit out of here
[Reply]

Peter Blutarsky- No thank you! Terrible trade.

When the Germans bombed Pearl Habor- did we give them our best guy for nothing? No!
[Reply]

i actually lol'd.
[Reply]

I'd been saying a #2 seemed like a fair price for ages.

With a #1 and 3 #2's, you can restock this defense quick. 2 CB's, a S and a DE. Sign stop-gap vets and roll. Then you can draft TE, OL, RB the rest of the way and start creating depth and competition on offense.
[Reply]

Mahomo you should have posted the tweet that followed that from Kent.

If the market for Dee Ford is the Packers and 49ers, best case scenario is that SF offered up 36 and Green Bay has offered 44 but the Chiefs are holding out for 30 or a swap of 12 and 29.

— Kent Swanson (@kent_swanson) March 9, 2019

Not bad, not bad. A pick swap for the first sounds insane.
[Reply]