Originally Posted by kccrow:
They need to cut Allen and trade/cut Mack. I'm sure there would be a market for Mack of some sort at 23m. I'm sure the Titans would give up a 4th or something to rent a pass rusher.
Although his stats are so inflated with the 6 sack game against the turnstile playing for the Raiders that day... [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mecca:
That is true but you really want to get away from having a ton of guys who only produce on manufactured touches, and of course you hope Rice develops out of being one of those.
If you're not bringing Hardman back, and you want Rice to get down the field more, you have to have someone in that role.
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15:
70% of Rashee's production came on exactly what people are shitting on Samuel for LOL.
Bring in Samuel and give Rash the opportunity to get down the field more in 2024.
(and I'm not thrilled about Samuel either, FTR)
But to say he doesn't fit doesn't make sense. Maybe he doesn't fit what YOU ALL want from the offense, but he fits.
It's redundant as fuck. We don't need another guy like this.
I LOVE Rashee Rice. I am one who believes he can lead the team in yards and will.
But they aren't just going to say all the sudden, "ya know Rashee, fuck everything you did last year, we are going to use you totally different this year and see how it goes"
YAC is his best trait.
He and Mahomes will improve at the intermediate to deep levels. The back-shoulder ball to Rice as an answer vs. man coverage will rise noticeably.
But they aren't gonna re-invent the wheel with his usage. [Reply]
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19:
It's redundant as fuck. We don't need another guy like this.
I LOVE Rashee Rice. I am one who believes he can lead the team in yards and will.
But they aren't just going to say all the sudden, "ya know Rashee, fuck everything you did last year, we are going to use you totally different this year and see how it goes"
YAC is his best trait.
He and Mahomes will improve at the intermediate to deep levels. The back-shoulder ball to Rice as an answer vs. man coverage will rise noticeably.
But they aren't gonna re-invent the wheel with his usage.
It's not reinventing the wheel, it's learning and mastering the route tree.
2023 was doing whatever they could to get him involved. If you think they drafted him to be 80% screens, well, you're wrong. They want him catching the ball on the move AND getting YAC. But the bubbles aren't going away and *someone* is gonna fill that role. [Reply]
#Chiefs Day 3 Free Agent Wish List: 1. Sign WR Hollywood Brown, Hunter Renfro, Mike Williams, or Keenan Allen. (Pick 1-Maybe 2) 2. Re-Sign LJarius Sneed 3. Sign DT DJ Reader 4. Sign RB JK Dobbins 5. Shock the AFC Today with Unexpected Move!@ChiefsBlitz
I think Drue Tranquill on his Zoom with us just entered the ranks of breaking news reporter by indicating that DT Mike Pennel is re-signing with the Chiefs.
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15:
It's not reinventing the wheel, it's learning and mastering the route tree.
2023 was doing whatever they could to get him involved. If you think they drafted him to be 80% screens, well, you're wrong.
I think he'll still get used for some of that, move into the slot in spots etc.
But you don't need to pay for manufactured touch guys, I'll take Samuel if he's playing for like I dunn0 2 years 8 mill, but if he wants real money no thanks. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mecca:
Man why does everyone want Ladd McConkey?
He is a precise route runner that could fit that intermediate role. I just think he is one of the few that we could plug and play early in Reids offense. [Reply]
#Chiefs Day 3 Free Agent Wish List: 1. Sign WR Hollywood Brown, Hunter Renfro, Mike Williams, or Keenan Allen. (Pick 1-Maybe 2) 2. Re-Sign LJarius Sneed 3. Sign DT DJ Reader 4. Sign RB JK Dobbins 5. Shock the AFC Today with Unexpected Move!@ChiefsBlitz
1. Yeah, probably Brown but definitely not the rest and not 2
2. Maybe...
3. Not a chance if 1 and 2 and probably not a chance either way
4. WTF? Why?
5. They'd have to pull off a trade to incite any sort of major reaction [Reply]
