Yea Bradshaw that's who it was he traded away...I knew it was someone good. The Colston for Marshall part of the deal I think by season's end will be pretty even...Colston hasn't done much yet but he'll come on eventually I think. He could have a good matchup this week against a weak Ariz. secondary actually. At the same time Marshall has been putting up some decent stats to this point. I'm not really sure how similar his and Colston' stats are right now but I think last time I checked Marshall's numbers were a bit ahead of Colston's at this point in time. Again don't hold me to that. I can tell you though that he thinks there's too many weapons in NO fantasy wise and that's why Colston hasn't produced much yet this season. Basically he just grew impatient. I still think he and Marshall are pretty even fantasy receivers by season's end. I think he also thought he'd have to throw in Bradshaw though to get Marshall's owner at time to bite on the trade. I told him try Colston for Marshall straight up first if he wanted him that bad and maybe throw in Snelling if he had to just to sweeten the deal but that from the get go Colston and Bradshaw was too much to give up unless he knew for sure that he had to. That's kind of my take on it as far as I understand it anyhow. If Portis was currently healthy, that deal would look a lot better for my brother I feel though. I'd still have to give the advantage to the team he traded with though. Colston and Bradshaw is a pretty darn sweet deal for him especially with the team he's already got.
[Reply]

I'd have joined this league if I'd have known it was full of soccer fans.
[Reply]

The simple fact is that this trade was crazy lopsided one way. I don't like vetos and if the two people agree to a trade then thats fine. But there is no way you can compare this to Doomys and Shormans trade at all.
[Reply]

Really a #1 WR and #2 RB (in 4-6 weeks) for a #3 WR and #2RB ins a PPR league?
[Reply]

Bradshaw is the 10th rated back in Fantasy Football. That would make him a RB1. There are a lot of rumors of Portis not playing another game for the Redskins.

But, the deal is through. No need to justify it.
[Reply]

I show 12 and that's also including the fact some teams have had byes. Matthews is rated 39th, is he the 39th best FFB RB? No.
[Reply]

I honestly don't know what to expect from Matthews. And that's an honest answer. He is a rookie who everyone expected big things from, and most still do. Tolbert has looked good though, so who knows if he eats into any of his carries.

It's much like Spiller. Who knows WTF to expect from here on out.
[Reply]

dude i'm not throwing you under the bus. I'm admitting I caved in like I shouldn't have. Just giving some advice thats it.
[Reply]

dude I admit I was wrong and caved in with my last post. Just stating a damn fact that I should have not caved in.
[Reply]

No, you've constantly made me look like an ass that made you do this deal. You keep using words like arguing, harassing, and bugging. You are a flat out liar, and there is nothing about our dealings that point to you "caving in" either. It is all right there in the email transcripts. Now, maybe you should just shut up and not mention it again. I don't like people making me out to be a bad guy or lying about how I acted.
[Reply]

Sure I was upset and in the heat of the moment. All I was saying in my last post is some advice stop taking everything personal. It a fucking game.
[Reply]

Don't say things about me and how I interacted with you that are made up, and I'll stop taking things personal. You're the one who keeps bringing up made up shit, and I'm simply responding to you.
[Reply]

Why do you have to prove yourself Doomy?
[Reply]

Seriously? You posted numerous times about me and even said that I should "make it right" as if I did something wrong. I'm proving you are a lying dumbass more than I am proving anything about myself. I don't appreciate you making things up simply because other people in the league are complaining about something.
[Reply]

Looks good now though after Lynch got traded
[Reply]