The tough thing is KC would have to motivate both he and Jones all the time. I’d be all for it though. Plus he being cut, doesn’t count towards comp picks. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mother****erJones:
The tough thing is KC would have to motivate both he and Jones all the time. I’d be all for it though. Plus he being cut, doesn’t count towards comp picks.
Looking at what’s available in FA, if you want to roll the dice on a DL player you probably look at Richardson or Wilkerson if indeed he is released. They would both be system fits. Their production has dropped dramatically, but maybe they need a change of scenery.
Reid will get the skinny on Wilkerson from Bowles. It doesn’t bode well that he was a healthy scratch the last few games this past season.
I would not be shocked if one of Logan or Poe were brought back on cheaper deals, and I’d be fine with that. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BossChief:
I wouldn’t have a problem signing him if it was a deal like Veach got Revis for. Low base with game by game incentives.
Give the guy 350k per sack and let him go get that money.
Add Wilkerson and Talib to the defense in FA and then go get Norwell for the offense. Re-sign Fulton.
Then draft all defense.
I don’t think that’s terribly unreasonable scenario.
KC isn’t paying Fulton. At least I don’t want them to. [Reply]
Originally Posted by raybec 4:
I disagree about KC not being active in free agency. They're freeing up a hell of a lot of cap room for 2018. I'll bet they use it.
I'm somewhere in between the two of you, I'm expecting them to be moderate players in FA. Nothing overly flashy, but we're likely to find value by spending smart money. [Reply]