well then why would you say that was the GREATEST post season game on chiefs QB history?

1) we lost
2) we didnt score any points (0 points) in the second half
3) the QB threw all of 4 deep passes the entire game
4) of those 4, 1 was caught for 20 yards
5) only 3 chiefs wr's had catches
6) those wr's had 52, 25 and 2 yards respectively
7) the second half drives: 5 punts and a missed fg
8) the last 9 drives:

-1 yard, -1 yard, 9 yards, 15 yards, 25 yards, 24 yards, 9 yards, 24 yards, -2 yards

9) net result of those last 9 drives: one FG attempt

10) alex smith was 22/33 for 243 yards , hardly mind blowing
11) yes he had 3 TD's but one was a single play drive when they fumbled at the goal line...without that gift, his stat line is this:

21/32 for 243 yards and 2 TD's


All in all, you are completely full of shit that this was 'the greatest post season performance by any chiefs QB'

You dont know wtf youre talking about
[Reply]

Because homie here didn't have any sort of clue what the Chiefs were about beyond the colors and location.

Well, I guess 2-14. Because that season apparently eclipses the fact that they were two blocked FGs away from back to back playoff appearances after being quarterbacked by Cassel, Palko and Orton.
[Reply]

You are a moron.
[Reply]

You're the moron, moron.
[Reply]

That didnt go the way you thought, did it?


[Reply]

Cuts both ways. Your complaint only establishes that he outperformed any other Chiefs QB's game output in 2 quarters.

Before people start bitching, that doesn't mean Alex is 'bestest ever.' It just means he's performed best in Chiefs' history, as as it is.
[Reply]

:-)
[Reply]

well

I will submit that you are incorrect

Montana's overtime win against Pittsburg comes to mind as clearly better and if needed I can probably come up with more.

I would also submit that , by his own petard, the WIN is the most important thing, according to 'all he does is win' guy so therefore even Deberg's win against the raiders is probably better

I stand by my original statement:

That 1st half against teh colts was the best HALF any chiefs QB has played in the post season. But the entire game? hardly


But all that being said how could you argue against Lenny D winning the superbowl??

Wasnt that the best performance by a QB, 'just winning' ?
[Reply]

i recall a playoff game against miami where both montana and allen were the sole reason we lost that game :-)
[Reply]

Don't forget Marty. He sucked the penis as a playoff coach.
[Reply]

Wait a second, I thought the only stat that mattered to you Alexsexuals was leading their TEAM to victory?!?!?

Only when it's convenient, I guess.
[Reply]

But isn't that the thing? Alex haters go on and on and on about 'just winning' isn't enough, until it makes Alex look bad, and suddenly it's the only thing once again.

That's the disconnect, few if anyone think that Alex is the best thing ever. Just good enough to succeed with.

But the detractors bend and twist each and every metric in their obsession to argue that he's the worst.

He can't do xxx.
Except when he did.
OK, he did. But not enough.
Well he does it quite a bit.
But not when it counts
Sure he did, except the rest of the team fell apart.
That's no excuse
It's an excuse for anyone but him
Oh, so he's as good as xxx and yyyy now?
Sometimes.
But not enough.


It's like fucking the most useless game of whack-a-mole ever.
[Reply]

Pop culture reference alert!!


[Reply]

Might as well rip open old wounds.

This entire mantra that 'Alex is good enough to get the team good, but not good enough to win a championship and championships are all that matters' is oddly reminiscent of the 14-2 Chargers.

Remember when the Chargers were 14-2?
Remember when the Chargers were adequate?
Remember when the Chargers weren't a joke?


[Reply]

[Reply]