We don't really have one of these yet, so figured we could use this as a place to discuss potential free agent acquisitions and what we would like to look for them to bring in.
If any of you guys are interested, heres a good place to do some research.
Originally Posted by Coogs:
That includes Fords Tag. There are ways to free up a lot of money. Nearly all of those ways include parting ways with Houston, Ford, and Berry.
And finally: 31. Buccaneers: $2,673,807 32. Jaguars: $1,758,439
Note: these numbers include only moves that have been made official by the league office. Trades such as the Joe Flacco deal and the cuts like the Jags' today have not yet been processed.
And finally: 31. Buccaneers: $2,673,807 32. Jaguars: $1,758,439
Note: these numbers include only moves that have been made official by the league office. Trades such as the Joe Flacco deal and the cuts like the Jags' today have not yet been processed.
Originally Posted by Coogs:
That includes Fords Tag. There are ways to free up a lot of money. Nearly all of those ways include parting ways with Houston, Ford, and Berry.
It would be nice if Ford didn’t cost so much but I digress. [Reply]
Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE!:
Ford won’t get traded to the Giants. They literally traded Vernon because he was due 15.5 each of the next two seasons
Vernon didn't perform well last season. Ford did. [Reply]
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
It would be nice if Ford didn’t cost so much but I digress.
I know your stance on Ford.
Me, I'm on record somewhere here wanting to move on from all three. Time for a fresh start.
And I am not on any bandwagon yet on who to bring in. Quite a few interesting options are becoming available. And I am not quite ready to kick the entire draft last season to the curb like some here already have. [Reply]
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19:
JFC dude. Mahomes was in his first year starting and they had a chance to create an all-time great set of weapons for him on offense. They were an all-time elite offense statistically and without any one of those star playmakers, things aren’t the same.
You bitch about overpaying him as if they would have been better off overpaying for Trumaine Johnson or some mediocre ass player. At least Watkins makes a difference.
Look at his cap number this year. That contract is a problem. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Superturtle:
Look at his cap number this year. That contract is a problem.
No doubt, it’s too high. I just hate when people bitch about where the money goes when if they weren’t spending the money at all, they’d be bitching about that too. Watkins was a luxury signing no doubt but at least they got something out of it. You have a star QB, RB, and WR all making pennies along with a star TE. Add one more stud receiver, even if you overpay, and your offense is borderline unstoppable.
Now, people don’t have to love that plan. But it did work. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Buckweath:
There is no way Hitchens' dreadful play was just on Sutton and the scheme.
I believe a lot of it truly was. You don't go from being an effective Linebacker to looking and playing like a lost child on Sunday because you forgot how to play football during the off season.
Don't underestimate how terrible Sutton had become and how far down the ladder of reality he had slipped. [Reply]
