Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry:
They can have Kevin Love.
For what? So they can be stuck in basketball mediocrity the next 4 years? They'll be an 8-10 seed, miss out on a top draft pick and be stuck in purgatory.
Pacers will end up taking a Lakers package eventually if I had to guess. Lakers should offer Randle/Clarkson and the 28. [Reply]
Originally Posted by The Bad Guy:
For what? So they can be stuck in basketball mediocrity the next 4 years? They'll be an 8-10 seed, miss out on a top draft pick and be stuck in purgatory.
Pacers will end up taking a Lakers package eventually if I had to guess. Lakers should offer Randle/Clarkson and the 28.
Originally Posted by New World Order:
Why? He only has one year on his deal.
Because it secures the asset. Lots can happen in a year.
Randle has one year left on his deal. You aren't going to pay him if you need the cap space to sign some big time free agents. Same with Clarkson - you need the cap space.
These aren't players that are apart of the Lakers future really. I wouldn't trade Ingram, the #2, Russell or Nance, but I wouldn't hesitate to include those guys. [Reply]
GS has a one star player advantage but you'd think that would partially be offset by LeBron being the best player in the world. But I guess not. Posted via Mobile Device [Reply]
Originally Posted by -King-:
GS has a one star player advantage but you'd think that would partially be offset by LeBron being the best player in the world. But I guess not. Posted via Mobile Device
No they don't.
Draymond's 10 ppg is really an all-star advantage? [Reply]
Watching the new 30 for 30 about the rivalry history of Celtics/Lakers. Being of the age I am, I am familiar with the Magic/Bird years, but it's fascinating to watch the Auerbach years thus far.
Highly recommend.
Red lighting up a stogie right on the bench with time running down in championship after championship is the ultimate baller move. [Reply]