29. Kansas City Chiefs
TRADE: Nos. 32 and 131 to DET for No. 29
Pick: Tyler Guyton, OT, Oklahoma
The Chiefs love offensive lineman from Oklahoma, including Creed Humphrey and Orlando Brown Jr. Guyton could be GM Brett Veach’s latest foray from the Sooners, stepping in to be the stalwart at left tackle for Patrick Mahomes. After signing Marquise “Hollywood” Brown, Kansas City’s clear need is protecting Mahomes’s blindside.
I love Verderame but Tyley Guyton is not a stalwart LT lol... [Reply]
Originally Posted by Jerm:
I love Verderame but Tyley Guyton is not a stalwart LT lol...
Agreed. I think he's an NFL RT. He's tall and I can't say I've seen too many great LTs over 6'6" over the years. All of his major experience is at RT and it's limited at that. Calling him a "stalwart" is overly premature. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Jerm:
I love Verderame but Tyley Guyton is not a stalwart LT lol...
I would rather have Morgan because I think he would give us more versatility, but it would be a tough choice if both are available there. Guyton is higher rated at tackle, but I think at LT I would rather have Morgan, who I can eventually move to Thuney's position and not lose a step in a couple of years if needed.
Morgan's floor is an average to above average starter even at tackle IMO. [Reply]
Originally Posted by O.city:
I’d love to trade up a little and get a LT
I'm hoping that Morgan is there at 32 and then try trading up in the second to get one of the WR's you like there. If the draft falls our way you might be able to trade back a few spots to move that 64 up and get both a tackled like Morgan and one of the 2nd tier WR's. One of the simulators I was able to trade back with Carolina at 33 and got their 39 by giving up 64 and 173 and got Morgan/Legette. [Reply]
I don't think there's any way in hell we can trade up for a sure-fire LEFT tackle.
But I'm still not so sure we don't take a tackle. And it may well still be a good value pick.
Taylor's athleticism and contract leads me to believe that the team was comfortable with him at either side, and while Morris was a mixed bag last season,he was perfectly serviceable in three of four games. The whole team was a dumpster fire in Vegas, so I don't think that's a fair measuring stick.
If the team wants to shore up the OT situation, take a guy with the physical attributes and take 3 physical specimens into camp and figure it out.
We're just not going to get into position for one of the sure-fire guys. [Reply]
Dunder brought up a great point about projection in the WR thread but wanted to elaborate with real numbers. There just aren't many OTs with actual experience at LT in this draft. Take from the following what you will, but my opinion remains that its not that strong of a LT class despite the quality of the overall class unless you really strain and project.
Here's an in-depth look at the OLine class with guys who at least spent some time at one of the tackle spots. I'll bold those with at least 10 games started at LT. I'll highlight in red those where the prevailing thought is they have to move inside to OG or OC. I'll make those blue where the thought is they cannot play LT in the NFL and the position is up in the air (RT/IOL).
Originally Posted by kccrow:
Dunder brought up a great point about projection in the WR thread but wanted to elaborate with real numbers. There just aren't many OTs with actual experience at LT in this draft. Take from the following what you will, but my opinion remains that its not that strong of a LT class despite the quality of the overall class unless you really strain and project.
Here's an in-depth look at the OLine class with guys who at least spent some time at one of the tackle spots. I'll bold those with at least 10 games started at LT. I'll highlight in red those where the prevailing thought is they have to move inside to OG or OC. I'll make those blue where the thought is they cannot play LT in the NFL and the position is up in the air (RT/IOL).