It's pretty simple.
They played great defense, didn't make stupid mistakes and they had a clutch QB. Usually 2/3 will win you the game in the NFL, so having all three made them damn tough to beat. Brady didn't have anything to do with the defense and Bill didn't have anything to do with the clutch QB, but they both were great at preventing the team from making bone-headed mental gaffes that many other teams do repeatedly. [Reply]
Originally Posted by crispystl:
It's pretty simple.
They played great defense, didn't make stupid mistakes and they had a clutch QB. Usually 2/3 will win you the game in the NFL, so having all three made them damn tough to beat. Brady didn't have anything to do with the defense and Bill didn't have anything to do with the clutch QB, but they both were great at preventing the team from making bone-headed mental gaffes that many other teams do repeatedly.
He may not have had anything to do with the clutch factor, but he always provided Tom with a very good offensive line and receivers that could get open underneath, both playing in favor of Tom's success. [Reply]
Originally Posted by kccrow:
You think it's all Tom, and that's complete hogwash.
I've NEVER said it was all Tom.
I've gone on record saying SEVERAL times that Tom was the driving force behind the championships, but I've NEVER said BB contributed nothing. I've literally never said that.
I've even gone on record saying it's somewhere between 60/40 and 75/25.
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
I've NEVER said it was all Tom.
I've gone on record saying SEVERAL times that Tom was the driving force behind the championships, but I've NEVER said BB contributed nothing. I've literally never said that.
I've even gone on record saying it's somewhere between 60/40 and 75/25.
So you're wrong.
Even this take is atrocious.
Just those two? Those 16 of 20 years with a top 10 defense, and all those players, dont deserve 1% of credit? [Reply]