Originally Posted by Strongside:
Fuller has grossly underperformed since he got here.
.
Has he though?
He was never great. CP's hive mind just up and decided he was gonna be really good based on one season. His career prior to being traded was a mixed bag. I tried arguing that he was a "Toss up" kinda player in terms of what we may get, but of course i was told i was wrong, negative blah blah blah.
So i disagree. His average play isn't surprising, therefore i don't think he's "underperformed".
I think he's performed as well as a reasonable person should've expected considering his history. [Reply]
The other thing to consider is that the draft doesn’t fall how you want it to. Veach even said they wanted a corner but just couldn’t make it happen bc of the way it fell. [Reply]
Originally Posted by O.city:
I don't see anyone trading 2 firsts for him. Surely.
I could see it if he didn’t have the sideline bursts and wasn’t super outspoken. But couple that in with him needing a huge contract....I don’t see it.
I’m sure some team will prove me wrong though. [Reply]
Originally Posted by The Franchise:
I could see it if he didn’t have the sideline bursts and wasn’t super outspoken. But couple that in with him needing a huge contract....I don’t see it.
Originally Posted by Mecca:
That's basically true, and for the people bring it up, I think Fuller is a no go we really don't have anyone to play the slot outside of him.
I’m not for trading Fuller away, but Breeland played very well inside last year.
You can put Ramsey and Claiborne on the outside with Breeland inside.
Again, I’d prefer to keep Fuller, but it could work. [Reply]
Originally Posted by O.city:
Adding in the monster contract, I don't think so.
I'm guessing a 1 and a 2 get it done.
And I’d imagine the argument would be the 2020 9ers 2 vs our own 2021 2. If we got him for the 2020 1 and 2021 2 that would be a huge win for us [Reply]