Originally Posted by BrownRice:
I didn’t call 911. The complaints were walked in to the station. No one involved in the reporting called 911.
The only things I can confirm with you on those is that the second report with only one name was not filed against her. She was the one at home when the police arrived. His name is all over the actual report. He has been the one being investigated from the start. Also why he lost custody so quickly & she did not. All allegations of abuse are against him.
On the first report, both parties were at home when the police arrived. Allegations of abuse are, once again, only made against him. She is reported as neglecting the child for allowing him to remain in a home where his father is abusing him.
The first report, believe it or not, was filed after the child himself alleged to the reporting party that his father had been hurting him. They had daily contact with the child & had noticed “bumps & bruises” prior that “just weren’t right” but always had believable explanations. Not a family member or friend. Not even close to or related to the same persons who filed the second report.
The second report was reported by a very young couple who are extremely upset at even being involved in the situation as one of the parties is a high profile member of our City and was left with no other option than to do what he knew were the right thing(s) to do, after his girlfriend told him what her then very close friend (Espinal) had alleged to her to be going on in their home. This report was made after seeing the tweet that is said to have started it all.
At first the young couple thought for sure it was just a bad break up & that Espinal was just upset in running her mouth to her then friend. Once the tweet was put out though, they realized it might not be false, going back over the injuries they had witnessed the child to have had when they came in contact with him & that they needed to take further action than what the male had already done two days prior. They could not, in good conscience rely upon the first party he had told what was going on to properly handle the matter and assure the child was safe.
All the grandmas and grandpas in the situation that are being accused were not involved in the reporting whatsoever. Also, Hill was not the one to inform the Chiefs as to what was going on, that is a terribly wrong assumption. And if you read the context of my message, you should be able to figure out on your own who went to the organization with what they were told. And who filed the second report.
Also, the person who released the tape to the media was not one of the report filing parties. And it wasn’t Meredith. Meredith also had nothing to do with anything except for sending out a tweet. There was an agenda with the tweet. But on that day, at that time, none of those people involved in that agenda had any idea that an investigation had already been started by the NFL, and had only just been made aware of the first police report having been filed.
3/5 First report made based of child allegations
3/12 NFL Securities Letter
3/13 “The Tweet”
3/14 Second report based off Espinal’s claims to reporting party after seeing “the tweet”, also based off injuries they had witnessed the child have.
Originally Posted by BrownRice:
I didn’t call 911. The complaints were walked in to the station. No one involved in the reporting called 911.
The only things I can confirm with you on those is that the second report with only one name was not filed against her. She was the one at home when the police arrived. His name is all over the actual report. He has been the one being investigated from the start. Also why he lost custody so quickly & she did not. All allegations of abuse are against him.
On the first report, both parties were at home when the police arrived. Allegations of abuse are, once again, only made against him. She is reported as neglecting the child for allowing him to remain in a home where his father is abusing him.
The first report, believe it or not, was filed after the child himself alleged to the reporting party that his father had been hurting him. They had daily contact with the child & had noticed “bumps & bruises” prior that “just weren’t right” but always had believable explanations. Not a family member or friend. Not even close to or related to the same persons who filed the second report.
The second report was reported by a very young couple who are extremely upset at even being involved in the situation as one of the parties is a high profile member of our City and was left with no other option than to do what he knew were the right thing(s) to do, after his girlfriend told him what her then very close friend (Espinal) had alleged to her to be going on in their home. This report was made after seeing the tweet that is said to have started it all.
At first the young couple thought for sure it was just a bad break up & that Espinal was just upset in running her mouth to her then friend. Once the tweet was put out though, they realized it might not be false, going back over the injuries they had witnessed the child to have had when they came in contact with him & that they needed to take further action than what the male had already done two days prior. They could not, in good conscience rely upon the first party he had told what was going on to properly handle the matter and assure the child was safe.
All the grandmas and grandpas in the situation that are being accused were not involved in the reporting whatsoever. Also, Hill was not the one to inform the Chiefs as to what was going on, that is a terribly wrong assumption. And if you read the context of my message, you should be able to figure out on your own who went to the organization with what they were told. And who filed the second report.
Also, the person who released the tape to the media was not one of the report filing parties. And it wasn’t Meredith. Meredith also had nothing to do with anything except for sending out a tweet. There was an agenda with the tweet. But on that day, at that time, none of those people involved in that agenda had any idea that an investigation had already been started by the NFL, and had only just been made aware of the first police report having been filed.
3/5 First report made based of child allegations
3/12 NFL Securities Letter
3/13 “The Tweet”
3/14 Second report based off Espinal’s claims to reporting party after seeing “the tweet”, also based off injuries they had witnessed the child have.
If all this were true he'd be locked up right now.
So, apparently there is now news that Hill called the police on crystal for passing out and leaving the 3 year old son unattended in the house from a hotel room. Happened April 1st and Hill seen it from video cameras on his phone from the home. Lmao
This shit is crazy! The story is on yahoo sports news.
Originally Posted by MeatRock:
So, apparently there is now news that Hill called the police on crystal for passing out and leaving the 3 year old son unattended in the house from a hotel room. Happened April 1st and Hill seen it from video cameras on his phone from the home. Lmao
This shit is crazy! The story is on yahoo sports news.
Originally Posted by MeatRock:
So, apparently there is now news that Hill called the police on crystal for passing out and leaving the 3 year old son unattended in the house from a hotel room. Happened April 1st and Hill seen it from video cameras on his phone from the home. Lmao
This shit is crazy! The story is on yahoo sports news.
I'd like to know if the cameras captured the abuse or why they weren't mentioned/subpoenaed in the original reports. I'd think tampering with evidence would have been a juicy headline
Originally Posted by BlackOp:
Do you really think if Hill was an attractive white male superstar...there would be this level of outrage? Do think Disneyland is real?
The media would frame it as a dysfunctional situation..a couple that's getting counseling and needs privacy.
It might be an uncomfortable reality to accept...but it is what it is.
LOL, you are inferring that if Tyreek Hill was white, he would not be receiving this level of scrutiny? LOL.
I think you fail to reaize you are living in the early 90's and 80's. This is 2019, when situations like this arise with people of "color" everyone is walking on egg-shells with what to do, to not seem racist, as something you are already being the perfect example of. Inferring this situation has turned into racism.
In reality if this was a white man, they would have no problem how they handle it because he is white, and no one would accuse any punishment as being racist, since he is in fact, white, right?
Keep on with your racist agenda, you are only dividing this country more and more. :-)
Originally Posted by MeatRock:
So, apparently there is now news that Hill called the police on crystal for passing out and leaving the 3 year old son unattended in the house from a hotel room. Happened April 1st and Hill seen it from video cameras on his phone from the home. Lmao
This shit is crazy! The story is on yahoo sports news.
Originally Posted by BrownRice:
I didn’t call 911. The complaints were walked in to the station. No one involved in the reporting called 911.
The only things I can confirm with you on those is that the second report with only one name was not filed against her. She was the one at home when the police arrived. His name is all over the actual report. He has been the one being investigated from the start. Also why he lost custody so quickly & she did not. All allegations of abuse are against him.
On the first report, both parties were at home when the police arrived. Allegations of abuse are, once again, only made against him. She is reported as neglecting the child for allowing him to remain in a home where his father is abusing him.
The first report, believe it or not, was filed after the child himself alleged to the reporting party that his father had been hurting him. They had daily contact with the child & had noticed “bumps & bruises” prior that “just weren’t right” but always had believable explanations. Not a family member or friend. Not even close to or related to the same persons who filed the second report.
The second report was reported by a very young couple who are extremely upset at even being involved in the situation as one of the parties is a high profile member of our City and was left with no other option than to do what he knew were the right thing(s) to do, after his girlfriend told him what her then very close friend (Espinal) had alleged to her to be going on in their home. This report was made after seeing the tweet that is said to have started it all.
At first the young couple thought for sure it was just a bad break up & that Espinal was just upset in running her mouth to her then friend. Once the tweet was put out though, they realized it might not be false, going back over the injuries they had witnessed the child to have had when they came in contact with him & that they needed to take further action than what the male had already done two days prior. They could not, in good conscience rely upon the first party he had told what was going on to properly handle the matter and assure the child was safe.
All the grandmas and grandpas in the situation that are being accused were not involved in the reporting whatsoever. Also, Hill was not the one to inform the Chiefs as to what was going on, that is a terribly wrong assumption. And if you read the context of my message, you should be able to figure out on your own who went to the organization with what they were told. And who filed the second report.
Also, the person who released the tape to the media was not one of the report filing parties. And it wasn’t Meredith. Meredith also had nothing to do with anything except for sending out a tweet. There was an agenda with the tweet. But on that day, at that time, none of those people involved in that agenda had any idea that an investigation had already been started by the NFL, and had only just been made aware of the first police report having been filed.
3/5 First report made based of child allegations
3/12 NFL Securities Letter
3/13 “The Tweet”
3/14 Second report based off Espinal’s claims to reporting party after seeing “the tweet”, also based off injuries they had witnessed the child have.
It sure sounds like you're trying to tell us that a Chiefs player was the one who ratted on Tyreek initially.
Originally Posted by comochiefsfan:
It sure sounds like you're trying to tell us that a Chiefs player was the one who ratted on Tyreek initially. I find that incredibly hard to believe.
Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE!:
So what’s the consensus on here? Tyreek guilty or is he innocent? Will he be suspended or banned from the league? Will he be a member of the Chiefs or the Browns? Will he get an extension or no?
He's innocent. Well, he's guilty of having a crazy girlfriend who has terrible friends, and who also has an equally terrible family.
