Pringle was getting all the snaps down the stretch. Is he in the doghouse? (I'm only partially asking because I started him in fantasy thinking he'd get some looks with Watkins out)
Seems like he's regressed a lot this season, unfortunately... [Reply]
Hardman looks like he's getting ready to be a legit #2 receiver the last few games. He's routes have looked smooth and his hands have been consistent. We need him to be ready next year so we can dump Watkin's big salary. It's good to see him progressing. [Reply]
His TD today reminded me of Tyreek's TD against the Colts in the playoffs. Both plays looked like the defense was in slo-mo, and Hardman and Tyreek were at 1.25x speed.
Originally Posted by Toad:
That TD was impressive. No one laid a hand on him.
He has very good vision to go with his speed. He's had numerous YAC touchdowns where he's running through what looks like a place where he should be tackled, and he makes it out unscathed. [Reply]
I wouldn't be surprised if he's not a big focus in the offense the latter half of the season. People will complain that we're not seeing more of him against the easier schedule, and then long plays again in January. [Reply]
Still not a fan. I’d rather have DJ Metcalf. Metcalf will be in his way to the HOF while Mecole will be asking if you want fries with that in 5 years. [Reply]
Originally Posted by KChiefs1:
He had a good day for once.
Still not a fan. I’d rather have DJ Metcalf. Metcalf will be in his way to the HOF while Mecole will be asking if you want fries with that in 5 years.
:-) Deanthony Thomas has made it 6+ years in the league thus far and your prediction is that Mecole will be out of the league by the time he's 28?
You made a comment about Mahomes being figured out after the first drive in the Bills game thread last week so maybe you should chill with the hot takes, bud. [Reply]
The only gripe I've ever had with Hardman was that he would stop running once his pre-planned route was over and wouldn't give Patrick the ability to improvise. He's a young buck with lots of potential. [Reply]