Originally Posted by thechiefsrback:
Gut feeling says mahomes won’t play which will be disappointing. It’ll come down to the defense and Henne limiting his turnovers in order to win the game. Just hope chiefs keep it close and give themselves a chance
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
Look at them here, desperately seeking validation for their team.
It's so weird to me. Honestly, you are on a Chiefs Fan message board....seeking to do what, exactly? Have legit football convo about the X's & O's of the game? Nah, you are here to get opposing fans to validate your team. It's that simple, and it's pathetically insecure, IMO. [Reply]
Originally Posted by mililo4cpa:
I've asked two dozen times to all these Bills pukes running around:
What changed from the last matchup and how are the Bills going to adapt their gameplan to hide their deficiencies:
-who covers Hill / Kelce
-Do you play back in zone (like last time) or do you play up and blitz more?
-how are you going to generate pressure with just 4 consistently
-Receiver matchups: Obviously Diggs is great, but who else? a gimpy Beasley?
-Bills Running game v. our running D (weakness against weakness)
All I get are crickets.....and THE BILLS ARE A DIFFERENT TEAM!!!!!!
Go to the Bills board.
They think that White can cover Hill.
They think they have a LB that can cover Kelce.
For some reason they think their DL can force Patrick to throw to the sidelines, where they think they can take advantage?
They think they can run against us.
They think our secondary is trash.
They are scared of CEH.
They think Andy's lying about Mahomes, and that he really does have a concussion. Many of them think Henne will start. That right there is hilarious. [Reply]
Originally Posted by ChiTown:
It's so weird to me. Honestly, you are on a Chiefs Fan message board....seeking to do what, exactly? Have legit football convo about the X's & O's of the game? Nah, you are here to get opposing fans to validate your team. It's that simple, and it's pathetically insecure, IMO.
If it were about legitimate football conversation, they'd actually...you know...entertain other viewpoints.
The rigidity of the arguments suggests they're not here for "discussion" at all. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Megatron96:
A couple of them weren't trolling. But some of the takes were just odd.
"We're hungrier."
Wtf does that mean? And how would you even know? How do you even evaluate how "hungry" one team is over another?
"We don't like to run."
BS. If they could run the ball effectively, they would, period. Like has nothing to do with it.
And so on. And then some of them call that kind of commentary "analysis."
Well, there's no way you can have a conversation about how "hungry" one team is over another, so . . . ?
Honestly, it's the ones that call us "arrogant" that got it started for me.
They come here telling us over and over how their team is this, and their QB is that, and all these stats and scores and everything and then think they can say "but the Chiefs probably win" and that makes US arrogant and them...what, "realistic?"
The passive-aggressive behavior is just ridiculous. [Reply]
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
Honestly, it's the ones that call us "arrogant" that got it started for me.
They come here telling us over and over how their team is this, and their QB is that, and all these stats and scores and everything and then think they can say "but the Chiefs probably win" and that makes US arrogant and them...what, "realistic?"
The passive-aggressive behavior is just ridiculous.
And quite frankly, why does ANY opposing fan give a shit what ChiefsPlanet thinks of their team? You want validation? Well, then you better hope your team wins on Sunday. That should be all the validation that is needed. [Reply]
Originally Posted by ChiTown:
And quite frankly, why does ANY opposing fan give a shit what ChiefsPlanet thinks of their team? You want validation? Well, then you better hope your team wins on Sunday. That should be all the validation that is needed.
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
Honestly, it's the ones that call us "arrogant" that got it started for me.
They come here telling us over and over how their team is this, and their QB is that, and all these stats and scores and everything and then think they can say "but the Chiefs probably win" and that makes US arrogant and them...what, "realistic?"
The passive-aggressive behavior is just ridiculous.
Is there lots of Soy in Buffalo Wing sauce? That could explain it. [Reply]