Originally Posted by DaFace:
Strongly agree. That felt just as out of place in the movie as it did in the books.
yeah, but the WHOLE point was
spoiler alert if you haven't read book/watched movie:
hp saying to young son "you're named after the bravest man i've ever met".
that's what it was all about. the entire prologue. that one sentence. really. goddamned chills. right now. dammit. [Reply]
Also, hasn't Harry disarmed other Wizards in previous movies? and himself been disarmed? Does that mean his original wand wasn't his for most of the movies but still worked fine for him anyways?
they didn't even MENTION the deathly hallows in the king's cross scene. you know, where harry gets confirmation from dumbledore that he had sought them when he was younger and we find out that a lot of background info on why dumbledore did what he did, how he knew that harry was tethered to life by voldy, etc. plus, ya know, IT'S NOT LIKE THE FREAKING NAME OF THE MOVIE IS HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS. MAY AS WELL NOT EVEN FREAKING MENTION THEM IN ONE OF THE MOST PIVOTAL SCENES IN THE FREAKING SERIES