Originally Posted by Mile High Mania:
Overall, they're playing better with Lock... they're far from what they need to be, but the game @ KC should be better than many expected after the first game this year. KC will win, but it will be close - less than a TD.
You're a fucking retard if you think it will be less than a touchdown. [Reply]
Originally Posted by OKchiefs:
You're a ****ing retard if you think it will be less than a touchdown.
Interesting. During the current run, the KC margins of victory have been...
24
7
4
10
3
23
3
16
... it's only happened 50% of the time. (and 2 of the last 3)
I think Denver is playing better over the last month than they did when these two teams last met. And, I'm willing to suggest that Lock (even with only 2 games) can be expected to produce on par with the likes of the other QBs since Manning.
But, yeah - I suppose I'm jumping the shark. :-) Or not... [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mile High Mania:
Interesting. During the current run, the KC margins of victory have been...
24
7
4
10
3
23
3
16
... it's only happened 50% of the time. (and 2 of the last 3)
I think Denver is playing better over the last month than they did when these two teams last met. And, I'm willing to suggest that Lock (even with only 2 games) can be expected to produce on par with the likes of the other QBs since Manning.
But, yeah - I suppose I'm jumping the shark. :-) Or not...
What's been the score in KC?
2018 - KC 30-23
2017 - KC 29-19
2016 - KC 33-10
Scores in Denver are in no way representative of the average margin of victory we've had at Arrowhead. Our average margin of victory the past 3 years in Arrowhead has been almost 2 touchdowns at 13.33 points. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Showtime:
Coming in from PA for game will be my first. My hotel is 10 miles from arrowhead what time should I leave to go to game?
they shouldn't let you into the stadium. your whiny energy will poison everyone [Reply]
Originally Posted by OKchiefs:
What's been the score in KC?
2018 - KC 30-23
2017 - KC 29-19
2016 - KC 33-10
Scores in Denver are in no way representative of the average margin of victory we've had at Arrowhead. Our average margin of victory the past 3 years in Arrowhead has been almost 2 touchdowns at 13.33 points.
Originally Posted by Mile High Mania:
Interesting. During the current run, the KC margins of victory have been...
24
7
4
10
3
23
3
16
... it's only happened 50% of the time. (and 2 of the last 3)
I think Denver is playing better over the last month than they did when these two teams last met. And, I'm willing to suggest that Lock (even with only 2 games) can be expected to produce on par with the likes of the other QBs since Manning.
But, yeah - I suppose I'm jumping the shark. :-) Or not...
:-) What happens EVERY time you do this? Thank you very much! [Reply]
I fuck with Ngakoue for this. Helped rivers up and then rivers is being a clown in his face up 5 scores. Takes a big man to keep your cool there pic.twitter.com/Ea3aZAqJ9Y
Originally Posted by TEX: :-) What happens EVERY time you do this? Thank you very much!
Hey, all I did was commit to a score... something you and Pasta say never happens. The goober says it’s retarded and I simply showed it has happened half the time during this run, including last year at Arrowhead.
Originally Posted by Mile High Mania:
Hey, all I did was commit to a score... something you and Pasta say never happens. The goober says it’s retarded and I simply showed it has happened half the time during this run, including last year at Arrowhead.
Guess.... we shall see?
You said it would be less than a touchdown. Is 7 less than a touchdown? You're full of shit. Go troll on the mange, retard. [Reply]
Originally Posted by OKchiefs:
You said it would be less than a touchdown. Is 7 less than a touchdown? You're full of shit. Go troll on the mange, retard.
Ah my bad... technically with the two point conversion, you get it.
Originally Posted by Mile High Mania:
Hey, all I did was commit to a score... something you and Pasta say never happens. The goober says it’s retarded and I simply showed it has happened half the time during this run, including last year at Arrowhead.
Guess.... we shall see?
Naw, I'm talking about how you always build your case, to degrade the streak, by focusing on the angle that the games, especially in Denver, could have gone either way. You usually include a little PA write up as to what happened. I notice that you just gave the scores this time. Good reason for that. We all know what happened in Denver this year.
I found it interesting that you did the same thing before the KC / Raiders games this season. Saying how much improved they were bla...bla...bla...I even reminded you then, of what happens when you do stuff like that.
That was a new low for you though - Wishing upon Raider Hope of all things. :-)
Anyway, back to your scores and how misleading they can be - I was at last year's KC - Den game, (You might have been in Spain) and KC was up 30 - 14 in the 4th. That game was never in doubt or as close as the final score would indicate.
Getting back to this game, I think the best thing that could have happened is for the Broncos to spank the Texans the way they did. It shows that if a good team takes a bad one too lightly, they can get soundly beat. I'm sure it got the Chiefs attention, and if they're focused, they'll roll Donk. So, "Bring it!" [Reply]
