Originally Posted by royr17:
Yall boys better listen and learn your lesson from Scanfan, because she knows more about the guy then any of you bozzos do and if she tells you he's good than she knows he is.
I only know what i know from seeing the very little of him i have seen in to tell you the truth i was impressed with him alot.
The fact that a poster either shares thanksgiving dinner with, or more likely lays down for a player, doesn't exactly give them exlusive rights to judge what they do on the field.
The fact that he might have a swollen knuckle that makes for a fabulous shocker, or a pecker so crooked he could pee around a corner have no bearing on his ability to make a tackle in the open field, or wrap up a ball carrier with explosion and good technique.
I can understand why someone with a personal relationship with a player would be more "sensitive" to criticism, but I can also see how a player might not be too keen on someone in thier lives acting like a vegas Escourt online too. [Reply]
I am not against this guy. I just dont see what anyone sees in him. If he couldn't get himself off our practice squad with our pathetic LB corp that tends to make me feel like he isn't that great. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Cochise:
I am not against this guy. I just dont see what anyone sees in him. If the couldn't get himself off our practice squad with our pathetic LB corp that tends to make me feel like he isn't that great.
Thats the funny thing...the worse Mitchell does the worse it makes Scanlon look because as bad as our starter is Scan is not good enough to replace him.