Originally Posted by -King-:
Yeah, outside of having the same amount of interceptions in 6 games that Kaepernick had in 11, and being better in every other stat, I guess they're not that different. Good point I guess.
From the stats you posted, they BOTH suck. And setting aside Chip Kelly, Kaepernick was a lot less effective the more time went on with Harbaugh in San Fran. NFL defensive coordinators figured out that Kap cannot read a defense and they began shutting him down. Harbaugh did a hell of a job hiding his weakness early on. There is no reason to believe that he has magically learned how to read defenses in the last couple years. [Reply]
Originally Posted by scho63:
This whole thing is just one more weird event surrounding Kaepernick. Last minute move from one facility to another.
What a clusterfuck!
He’s even changed the way he talks to sound more urban. If you search for some of his older interview on YouTube, you’ll notice a distinct difference in the way he talks now. Dude is just a clown show now. [Reply]
Originally Posted by eDave:
OH for God's sake. This shit is bizarre.
Its symbolic of the NFL and holding him down and his struggle to overcome the plantation owners treatment of him. Fighting to break the chains. Speaking the words of a free man.
He obviously didn't want to do the workout the NFL had planned, and didn't want to work out at all without the media there. He treated it as a stunt. [Reply]
Originally Posted by -King-:
Yeah, outside of having the same amount of interceptions in 6 games that Kaepernick had in 11, and being better in every other stat, I guess they're not that different. Good point I guess.
My sarcasm meter says you are being sarcastic, but they really aren't that different. If Gabbert completes one more pass a game, they probably are damn near one and the same on the first three categories. [Reply]
Originally Posted by FAX:
Yep. Once again ChiefsPlanet has solved the vexing problem the sporting world has wrestled with for years ... Kapperdink is better than Gabbert.
Originally Posted by Eleazar:
He obviously didn't want to do the workout the NFL had planned, and didn't want to work out at all without the media there. He treated it as a stunt.
Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy:
The whole thing is a ****ing joke
The idea this is something that needs to happen is the joke. Dude made his bed.
The kneeling isn't what got him banned, the stupid narrative he started pushing, the socks, the t-shirts, and his GF going off on owners on twitter is what nailed his coffin shut.
He could have been diplomatic and professional instead he chose the route of dissent.
And his comments from yesterday probably didn't help him either. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Coogs:
My sarcasm meter says you are being sarcastic, but they really aren't that different. If Gabbert completes one more pass a game, they probably are damn near one and the same on the first three categories.
If Gabbert plays 11 games he throws 10 touchdowns and 12 INTS. That's a huge difference from 14 touchdowns and 6 INTs. It's not even comparable.
You can have a winning record with what Kaepernick did if you don't allow 30+ points in 80% of games but you can't win if the QB had a negative TD:INT ratio basically no matter what. [Reply]
Originally Posted by -King-:
If Gabbert plays 11 games he throws 10 touchdowns and 12 INTS. That's a huge difference from 14 touchdowns and 6 INTs. It's not even comparable.
11 TD's not 10.
And who is to say that Gabbert couldn't go off for a 2 to 3 TD day, with close to 300 yards in one of those other 6 games. Maybe more than once.
Come on man. Kaep is slightly better than Gabbert on the stats you gave. Slightly.
And who is to say that Gabbert couldn't go off for a 2 to 3 TD day, with close to 300 yards in one of those other 6 games. Maybe more than once.
Come on man. Kaep is slightly better than Gabbert on the stats you gave. Slightly.
Gabbert for Christ's sakes!
And he could also go off for 3 INTS. You keep trying to ignore interceptions for some odd reason. Actually it's not that odd,it's obvious why you're trying to ignore them. Because they totally kill your argument.
A 14:6 TD:INT ratio is A LOT better than a 5:6 TD:INT ratio and it's not even close. [Reply]