I don't see how we'd give up the draft capital discussed and the contract needed... and I don't know that we can give up that much for a rental. [Reply]
Originally Posted by nychief:
I don't see how we'd give up the draft capital discussed and the contract needed... and I don't know that we can give up that much for a rental.
salary cap is a myth there are always ways to get around it, plus it will go up huge after the new deal. Do not worry about paying guys [Reply]
Originally Posted by nychief:
I don't see how we'd give up the draft capital discussed and the contract needed... and I don't know that we can give up that much for a rental.
Why does he have to be a rental?
You don't want to keep a 24 year old CB that is an elite player? [Reply]
Originally Posted by nychief:
Me? Yes. I do. But we have Pat's deal coming up, jones, new kelce prolly...curious how it would work.
I'm going to get very real, in todays NFL a CB has more value than a DT, also the cap is about to rise a ton if you can kick the can past 2020 on these guys. [Reply]
Originally Posted by TEX:
You mean Thursday...And they didn't do that with Earl Thomas and Seattle last year.
It seemed like there was still some back and forth as to what the final compensation was going to be though. If there is actually a deal in place that won't happen. But ya, the jags could say we're going to wait it out and not hurry and get it done. [Reply]
Originally Posted by TEX:
You mean Thursday...And they didn't do that with Earl Thomas and Seattle last year.
Yes, I meant tomorrow, and it's BECAUSE of Earl Thomas that they will want him to be inactive. They're not going to risk the same scenario again. [Reply]