Originally Posted by The Franchise:
I just don’t like having a ton of speedy, short WRs. We already have to manufacture touches for Hardman. I don’t want another guy like that.
The problem is, it seems those are the guys Andy really wants. :-) [Reply]
Originally Posted by The Franchise:
I just don’t like having a ton of speedy, short WRs. We already have to manufacture touches for Hardman. I don’t want another guy like that.
This x1000
I want a 6'2ish receiver who can go up and get the ball.
Especially when teams are playing Cover 3. [Reply]
Originally Posted by The Franchise:
I just don’t like having a ton of speedy, short WRs. We already have to manufacture touches for Hardman. I don’t want another guy like that.
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
The problem is, it seems those are the guys Andy really wants. :-)
Eh, i don't think so.
But i also don't think he's looking for a traditional big body, high point the ball kinda guy either.
I think that other WR will be somewhere between 6-0" - 6-2", 205-215 lbs and can still run a forty in the mid 4.4's-ish.
He wants a bigg-er guy, not a big guy. This bigger guy still needs to be able to get over the top if left 1v1 and have enough wiggle to do damage after the catch.
You know...Sammy Watkins. To a lesser degree, Chris Conley, Byron Pringle. The Chiefs have pretty much shown us what they want out of that position already.
Problem is there aren't many of those guys this year. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Chris Meck:
I think he likes to have one or two. All the rest of our WR's have been bigger, X types.
Hill, yes.
Hardman may or may not have been an emergency insurance policy when the Hill crazy ex girlfriend shit was going down.
The rest? Conley, Watkins, Robinson, Pringle-all 6'0 plus, 205-210 guys.
I seriously doubt another tiny speedster is in the cards unless it's very late or UDFA.
Originally Posted by Detoxing:
Eh, i don't think so.
But i also don't think he's looking for a traditional big body, high point the ball kinda guy either.
I think that other WR will be somewhere between 6-0" - 6-2", 205-215 lbs and can still run a forty in the mid 4.4's-ish.
He wants a bigg-er guy, not a big guy. This bigger guy still needs to be able to get over the top if left 1v1 and have enough wiggle to do damage after the catch.
You know...Sammy Watkins. To a lesser degree, Chris Conley, Byron Pringle. The Chiefs have pretty much shown us what they want out of that position already.
Problem is there aren't many of those guys this year.
Watkins and those kinds of guys are still guys that excel at getting open underneath and making YAC.
When is the last time Andy really had a guy that was a big-bodied jump ball-type guy? Terrell Owens maybe? [Reply]
Originally Posted by duncan_idaho:
I think Toney is going to fall, too. He's got a small track record of success AND is still a little raw. There's also this:
The guy got pulled over in college with a locked and loaded AR-15 on his backseat.
Well he was in Florida. Thats legal open carry in FL
Originally Posted by Detoxing:
Eh, i don't think so.
But i also don't think he's looking for a traditional big body, high point the ball kinda guy either.
I think that other WR will be somewhere between 6-0" - 6-2", 205-215 lbs and can still run a forty in the mid 4.4's-ish.
He wants a bigg-er guy, not a big guy. This bigger guy still needs to be able to get over the top if left 1v1 and have enough wiggle to do damage after the catch.
You know...Sammy Watkins. To a lesser degree, Chris Conley, Byron Pringle. The Chiefs have pretty much shown us what they want out of that position already.
Problem is there aren't many of those guys this year.
Originally Posted by duncan_idaho:
I think Toney is going to fall, too. He's got a small track record of success AND is still a little raw. There's also this:
The guy got pulled over in college with a locked and loaded AR-15 on his backseat.
Did he get in trouble for that or something? [Reply]