ChiefsPlanet Mobile
View Poll Results: Will you be upset if the Chiefs draft Geno Smith?
Yes 22 10.53%
No 179 85.65%
I drink Tequila Rose...like Gaz 8 3.83%
Voters: 209. You may not vote on this poll
Page 12 of 23
« First < 289101112 1314151622 > Last »
Nzoner's Game Room>My final Geno thread before the draft
Mr. Flopnuts 10:05 AM 04-07-2013
Simple question. Will you be upset if the Chiefs draft Geno Smith? If so, why?
[Reply]
O.city 08:29 PM 04-07-2013
Joeckel doesn't fit Reid's "LT" players, based on history.
[Reply]
MotherfuckerJones 08:32 PM 04-07-2013
Originally Posted by R8ers:
Pick who you want, we will have that pick next year and you will have the second pick :-)
I'll bet you anything we dont have the 2nd overall pick next year.
[Reply]
Sweet Daddy Hate 09:07 PM 04-07-2013
Originally Posted by penbook:
Reid did when he was drating Mcnabb. I couldnt remember who but somebody offered Reid there whole draft for the #2 spot and Reid said no.
How does that count? He was already up top. I said, "sell the house to move UP and secure a QB".
Posted via Mobile Device
[Reply]
HonestChieffan 09:09 PM 04-07-2013
Marginal at best
[Reply]
Sweet Daddy Hate 09:09 PM 04-07-2013
Originally Posted by patteeu:
If only we had Daniel Snyder calling the shots here, it would be paradise!
Say what the fuck you will, they did what had to be done. And if you can't get behind that kind of move, then you obviously don't want a legit QB.
Posted via Mobile Device
[Reply]
RunKC 09:14 PM 04-07-2013
Originally Posted by SNR:
Answer the question
I did. Geno is not a franchise QB like you are claiming. Hell he's not that great of a QB prospect at that.

If we take a QB, I want a guy who we believe can be a franchise QB one day. It's obvious that we aren't the only one's who believe Geno isn't that guy.

The LT's are the best prospects in this draft and that's our plan.
[Reply]
RunKC 09:15 PM 04-07-2013
Originally Posted by O.city:
Joeckel doesn't fit Reid's "LT" players, based on history.
We are drafting BPA and Joeckel is the BPA. Him or Fisher. One of the LT's, unless we can't trade Albert.

We don't trade Albert and it's Dion Jordan time.
[Reply]
Sweet Daddy Hate 09:18 PM 04-07-2013
Originally Posted by RunKC:
But they are just better football players than Geno.

And Luke Joeckel looks to be better than Branden Albert for multiple reasons.
Name them. I'll wait.
Posted via Mobile Device
[Reply]
O.city 09:19 PM 04-07-2013
Originally Posted by RunKC:
We are drafting BPA and Joeckel is the BPA. Him or Fisher. One of the LT's, unless we can't trade Albert.

We don't trade Albert and it's Dion Jordan time.
So bpa doesn't account for need and or positional value?

If joeckel and fisher are bpa, an that's what we are drafting why does itatter in terms of what they do with Albert?
[Reply]
penbrook 09:19 PM 04-07-2013
Originally Posted by Sweet Dick Willie:
Name them. I'll wait.
Posted via Mobile Device
Joeckel gonna be better than Albert :-)
[Reply]
keg in kc 09:20 PM 04-07-2013
Originally Posted by RunKC:
I did. Geno is not a franchise QB like you are claiming. Hell he's not that great of a QB prospect at that.

If we take a QB, I want a guy who we believe can be a franchise QB one day. It's obvious that we aren't the only one's who believe Geno isn't that guy.

The LT's are the best prospects in this draft and that's our plan.
No, you're not answering his question.

His question is at what point does positional value overtake individual player value.

I hesitate to paraphrase, but his thinking is that no LT will ever have 1:1 value. So he will always choose a "lesser" player at another position over the top LT.

Meaning to him, if he agrees for the sake of argument that Geno is not a franchise QB, he would still take him over any of the tackle prospects, despite their (again, theoretical for the sake of argument) higher grades.

So basically a QB with a 91 rating is more valuable than a LT with a 98.

(This happens to be my thinking as well)

His point was at what point to you agree with that, if ever? And then further, with which positions would that be true?

Is that a fair characterization SNR?
[Reply]
penbrook 09:20 PM 04-07-2013
Originally Posted by O.city:
So bpa doesn't account for need and or positional value?

If joeckel and fisher are bpa, an that's what we are drafting why does itatter in terms of what they do with Albert?
BPA will determine what Dorsey values more a LT or a QB.
[Reply]
Gravedigger 09:20 PM 04-07-2013
Originally Posted by Mother****erJones:
I'll bet you anything we dont have the 2nd overall pick next year.
Yeah, who do you think we are? The Raiders?
[Reply]
O.city 09:21 PM 04-07-2013
Again if we use the same reasons we do for why geno doesn't fit, based on Reid's history, how does joeckel fit? He's not a big physical lt. Doesn't have elite measurables either.


If they take a lt, i don't see it being him
[Reply]
RunKC 09:21 PM 04-07-2013
Originally Posted by O.city:
So bpa doesn't account for need and or positional value?

If joeckel and fisher are bpa, an that's what we are drafting why does itatter in terms of what they do with Albert?
I wouldn't be surprised if we draft a LT and keep Albert regardless.

QB is not a need now. We have our guy. And he's going to be here awhile. Let it go.
[Reply]
Page 12 of 23
« First < 289101112 1314151622 > Last »
Up