It's finally Draft Day Eve, as I'd call it. We've pondered back and forth the possibilities that come with picking at #27 for months, and now its almost time to see who is under the Chiefs' tree in 2017.
So, a day ahead, call your shot below. Who you want them to pick, who you believe they will pick, or both. [Reply]
Hoping for edge rusher, or a solid cb opposite of Peters in the first. Then trade up into the early second to get a qb they like. Don't want to take another guy who won't see the field for a year in the first. There should be a couple decent qb in the early second. None of these qb's are NFL ready. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Coochie liquor:
Hoping for edge rusher, or a solid cb opposite of Peters in the first. Then trade up into the early second to get a qb they like. Don't want to take another guy who won't see the field for a year in the first. There should be a couple decent qb in the early second. None of these qb's are NFL ready.
If you like a QB enough to spend the picks to trade up in the second you should just take him in the 1st. The fact that he'll have to sit a year makes the 5th year option more valuable. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pestilence:
Drafting Mahomes would be awesome in two ways.
1. We'd have a direction for this team.
2. Clay would be ****ing pissed. Even moreso if we trade up for him.
why would you be pissed at taking any of the top 3 QBs? They are literally an upgrade to Alex Smith and signal that his time will eventually be over, and the team will actually have a direction other than losing in the divisional round by field goals because our 32 year old QB can't throw a touchdown when it matters most.
Watson, Mahomes, pretty much anyone and I am happy. Except Peterman he is an Alex Smith clone and stinks. [Reply]
Originally Posted by :
— Multiple teams picking in the backend of Round 1 believe Reuben Foster will be on the board for them. The Chiefs, Packers or Saints could stop his fall, which would be more related to his injury history than his character concerns.
Originally Posted by mcaj22:
why would you be pissed at taking any of the top 3 QBs? They are literally an upgrade to Alex Smith and signal that his time will eventually be over, and the team will actually have a direction other than losing in the divisional round by field goals because our 32 year old QB can't throw a touchdown when it matters most.
Watson, Mahomes, pretty much anyone and I am happy. Except Peterman he is an Alex Smith clone and stinks.
Because Clay gets his kicks by being a malcontent. Having a franchise QB in the system would ruin his shtick. [Reply]
I am not a R Foster fan....in fact, I am not a fan of ANY Albama player. Their teams are so stacked at so many positions that it's difficult to determine how a given player will stack up without such stout assistance. Foster is a prime example. He's essentially got 5-star players all around him keeping him relatively clean from blockers and able to make a ton of plays. Kudos to him for coming thru and making said plays, but, would he excel if surrounded by lesser players. Thanks, but I'd generally pass on drafting Alabama players. [Reply]