Originally Posted by gblowfish:
Uh, wasn't that what the Hardman pick was all about?
As others have said, Hardman was a hedge against possibly losing Hill. Even if the team was completely convinced he was innocent, they were still trying to extend him and there was no guarantee they were going to reach an agreement with what was going on.
Watkins and Hardman are completely different types of receivers. [Reply]
We definitely should get a receiver in the second round which seems to be a sweet spot for teams with good scouts. Like us and the Steelers and the Seahawks. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Kiimosabi:
We definitely should get a receiver in the second round which seems to be a sweet spot for teams with good scouts. Like us and the Steelers and the Seahawks.
Fuck that. Get us all the fatties and LBs! [Reply]
Originally Posted by patteeu:
What do you think the Chiefs will do next year for Sammy’s role?
Just a feeling, but I think they'll try to keep Sammy. There's really no replacing Sammy with a drafted rookie, and there's not a lot of vet WRs of his caliber/skill set willing to be the 3rd option. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Megatron96:
Just a feeling, but I think they'll try to keep Sammy. There's really no replacing Sammy with a drafted rookie, and there's not a lot of vet WRs of his caliber/skill set willing to be the 3rd option.
Yeah as long as he's reasonable with the contract demands for next year like he was this year, sure bring him back. [Reply]
I should be clear that I think Andy/Veach will draft a WR in the hopes of that guy eventually taking over for Sammy, but for next season at least I think they want Sammy on the team, maybe as a mentor to whoever they draft/bring in.
So I'm not saying that they'll try to keep Sammy beyond next season, but I think they'll keep him around for next season. [Reply]