I've gone back and forth. I'd probably rather have Peterson as he'd be cheaper, but if you could get Howard and have that deal locked in and him for that long, that might be more palatable. [Reply]
Originally Posted by O.city:
I've gone back and forth. I'd probably rather have Peterson as he'd be cheaper, but if you could get Howard and have that deal locked in and him for that long, that might be more palatable.
Peterson is going to cost a high second rounder (49rs pick) most likely. If you could give up our First rounder, not much higher than the second round pick, for Howard, then you do that! At least in my opinion. [Reply]
If it were possible to trade the 9ers pick and one more later, like a 4 or the next years 3 possibly id do it today. dee ford and a pick for xavien howard? done fucking deal boys. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Dunerdr:
If it were possible to trade the 9ers pick and one more later, like a 4 or the next years 3 possibly id do it today. dee ford and a pick for xavien howard? done fucking deal boys.
The Dolphins won't even think about trading Howard unless a 1st is involved...
Look at what they just got for Tunsil. Howard is the equivalent at his position which you could make the argument is more important nowadays than LT.
I think you some of you are seriously underestimating what these deals are going to take. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Jerm:
You're not getting an elite CB still in his prime on a somewhat friendly deal for a 2nd or a 3rd...come on.
And THAT'S exactly the kind of things teams do that leads to big problems down the road. It's one thing to give up assets and extend young players entering their prime, it's an entirely different matter to do it for older one's. [Reply]
Originally Posted by TEX:
And THAT'S exactly the kind of things teams do that leads to big problems down the road. It's one thing to give up assets and extend young players entering their prime, it's an entirely different matter to do it for older one's.
Right, which is why lean towards Howard over PP. [Reply]