Originally Posted by HolyHandgernade:
It used to be KU policy that you could have clubs on campus that restricted their membership, but such clubs would not be allowed to use campus facilities to hold their meetings. IOW, if you made club whose religious views did not tolerate homosexuality nor homosexuals, you could not use campus facilities to operate your club. You had the right to organize as a campus club but if you didn't open your membership to all, you could not use campus facilities to conduct its meetings or hold its events.
The Kansas State Legislature decided that was "discrimination" and forced KU to allow discriminatory clubs the same access to campus facilities. It should be noted Douglass County voted against this.
Since discriminatory clubs are now allowed on any state campus because of this legislation, California law prevents their state schools from providing resources to schedule activities in said states.
so a group of skinhead Nazi's could legally hold a rally in the Phog and nothing KU could do about it? [Reply]
Originally Posted by BigRedChief:
so a group of skinhead Nazi's could legally hold a rally in the Phog and nothing KU could do about it?
If they were registered as a KU club, then, yes, strictly speaking. I do not know if there are other regulations regarding such a situation, however. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BigRedChief:
so a group of skinhead Nazi's could legally hold a rally in the Phog and nothing KU could do about it?
They could have done that before the law was repealed. Just before the Nazi's couldn't tell the jew, the black guy, and the Gay dude from legally joining their rally. Now they can. [Reply]
Originally Posted by fahrenheit:
They could have done that before the law was repealed. Just before the Nazi's couldn't tell the jew, the black guy, and the Gay dude from legally joining their rally. Now they can.
Close. It wasn't a law, it was University guideline for forming a club on campus. You could organize a club that discriminated in who could join. What you couldn't do was hold a meeting at room in the Student Union to facilitate the meetings of such a club.
Now, the University cannot withhold the access to said rooms from discriminatory groups.
For example, the PRIDE Club on campus could use campus facilities but they could not restrict their membership to gay students. Now, they could if they choose to do so. So, even though the club was aimed at gay students, the club couldn't restrict their membership from non-gay students. If they did, they would lose their ability to operate within a campus facility.
The change in policy is directed from the Kansas Legislature, not KU.
So, to use your example, Nazi Skinheads could organize a club at KU, and as long as they didn't discriminate who could join their club, they could use campus facilities. Now, because of the Legislature ruling, they can restrict their membership and apply for campus facility hosting. [Reply]
Buehler445 02-09-2017, 06:23 PM
This message has been deleted by Buehler445.
Reason: HH did it better.
Originally Posted by BWillie:
That might be KU next year. I hope not but...
Malik Newman
Sam Cunliffe
Billy Preston
Legerald Vick
That is lots of volume shooting with a limited other skillsets. Vick to a lesser degree, but he takes at least 2 "**** it, I'm shooting this one" shots a game in limited minutes.
Originally Posted by BWillie:
That might be KU next year. I hope not but...
Malik Newman
Sam Cunliffe
Billy Preston
Legerald Vick
That is lots of volume shooting with a limited other skillsets. Vick to a lesser degree, but he takes at least 2 "**** it, I'm shooting this one" shots a game in limited minutes.
Cunliffe ain't playing. Azbuike will be a beast inside. And we still may get Young, or Duval. Don't close the door on Porter either [Reply]
Originally Posted by Prison Bitch:
Cunliffe ain't playing. Azbuike will be a beast inside. And we still may get Young, or Duval. Don't close the door on Porter either
Why won't Cunliffe play? He'll be eligible second semester next year. He's a top 35-40 recruit. [Reply]
Originally Posted by HolyHandgernade:
Close. It wasn't a law, it was University guideline for forming a club on campus. You could organize a club that discriminated in who could join. What you couldn't do was hold a meeting at room in the Student Union to facilitate the meetings of such a club.
Now, the University cannot withhold the access to said rooms from discriminatory groups.
For example, the PRIDE Club on campus could use campus facilities but they could not restrict their membership to gay students. Now, they could if they choose to do so. So, even though the club was aimed at gay students, the club couldn't restrict their membership from non-gay students. If they did, they would lose their ability to operate within a campus facility.
The change in policy is directed from the Kansas Legislature, not KU.
So, to use your example, Nazi Skinheads could organize a club at KU, and as long as they didn't discriminate who could join their club, they could use campus facilities. Now, because of the Legislature ruling, they can restrict their membership and apply for campus facility hosting.