Originally Posted by DanBecky:
I'm assuming you mean Gerry McNamara, who was a pretty ****ing good college player. Would rank right up there with any guards KU has had.
Yes, forgive me for getting a players name wrong from 15...errrr...14 years ago...
his percentage in that game was ridiculous as I recall. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Reerun_KC:
California is a cesspool of aids and stupid.
What an embarrassing situation for those people from California to have to deal with.
Actually, we are a fountain of forward thinking economics and social progress. Making laws that allow public funding for bigoted groups is a cesspool of dipshittery that belongs in Iran, not the USA.
But enjoy your bankrupt state government and legalized discrimination. :-) [Reply]
Originally Posted by Buehler445:
I didn't even know Kansas had such laws on the books.
But wouldn't being a part of the NCAA violate that California law? I don't know what all contracts schools have with the NCAA, but you would think there would be a binding enough agreement with all NCAA schools that California smschooks would be considered to have a contract with all other NCAA schools. Right?
/not a lawyer
really? you think the california law is the one that needs to be invalidated? WTF is wrong with people. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Buehler445:
I didn't say shit about invalidating any law. All I said is surely all these schools have a contract with each other through the NCAA.
What law is CA all bent out of shape about? Honest question. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Buehler445:
I didn't say shit about invalidating any law. All I said is surely all these schools have a contract with each other through the NCAA.
That is today's politics. If you don't agree with everything they say, you're immediately discredited by being a racist, homophobe, xenophobe pig, Thug, deplorable, socialist, facist, Left-wing Nut job, bleeding-hearted, worm-headed sack of Monkeyshit you are. Hallelujah! Holy Shit! Where's the Tylenol? [Reply]
Kansas is on the travel prohibition list because of a 2016 law that enabled college campus religious groups to require that members adhere to their religious beliefs and standards. That law was crafted partially in response to a controversy in California that occurred when a Christian student group lost recognition on California State University campuses for failure to comply with an “all comers” non-discrimination policy in 2014.
Other states on the list are North Carolina, Tennessee and Mississippi. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Buehler445:
OMG MELT DOWN. Kansas actually allows religious groups to have practicing religion be a prerequisite for membership. Allows. Not forces.
OMG WTF BBQ We are all going to DIE!
i don't know what this means? Bapitists have a softball league that says you have to be Baptist to join? [Reply]
It used to be KU policy that you could have clubs on campus that restricted their membership, but such clubs would not be allowed to use campus facilities to hold their meetings. IOW, if you made club whose religious views did not tolerate homosexuality nor homosexuals, you could not use campus facilities to operate your club. You had the right to organize as a campus club but if you didn't open your membership to all, you could not use campus facilities to conduct its meetings or hold its events.
The Kansas State Legislature decided that was "discrimination" and forced KU to allow discriminatory clubs the same access to campus facilities. It should be noted Douglass County voted against this.
Since discriminatory clubs are now allowed on any state campus because of this legislation, California law prevents their state schools from providing resources to schedule activities in said states. [Reply]
