Market for Alex Smith will be strong, Ian Rapoport says
Ian Rapoport of the NFL Network thinks the Chiefs could get a solid trade haul in return for Alex Smith.
Kirk Larrabee - 3 hours ago 0
The Kansas City Chiefs should have no problem finding a trade partner for Alex Smith this offseason and could come away with a strong haul in return, according to insider Ian Rapoport of the NFL Network.
Rapoport, who reported over the weekend the Chiefs would be listening to offers for Smith this offseason, was a guest on The Day Shift on 610 Sports Radio Kansas City Monday, where he was asked about the level of interest in Alex Smith and whether or not the Chiefs will be able to trade him.
"A lot," Rapoport said. "A lot, and yes."
Smith is coming off his best statistical season of his career as he threw for 4,042 yards in 2017 with 26 touchdowns, five interceptions, and a 104.7 passer rating. Rapoport says it's that performance along with what Smith can bring to a team's quarterback room that makes him such a hot commodity.
"He was number one in the NFL in passer rating," Rapoport said. "He is a great person, so if you trade for him and then draft a quarterback high, you will get someone who's going to help him. All you need to do is ask Patrick Mahomes. It's actually an amazing thing what a great person Alex Smith is because he's dealt with a lot of crap in his career despite mostly awesome and has come out the other side of it."
There have been several teams speculated to be good fits for Smith, with different situations among each of them. There's the Jacksonville Jaguars and Buffalo Bills, playoff teams that are still fighting quarterback woes; there's the Arizona Cardinals, a team whose starting quarterback, Carson Palmer, just retired, but still has enough talent to be competitive next season; and there's a team like the Cleveland Browns, who might be interested in acquiring Smith to not just help the team start winning again but to be a mentor to a quarterback they might select in the draft.
The latter situation might not seem like an ideal one to many quarterbacks, but Smith has done it before, and Rapoport thinks he might not have a problem doing it again.
"If I was a franchise quarterback, would I really want to help the guy who is brought in to replace me? I don't know," Rapoport said. "For some ridiculous reason, Alex Smith has done it several times, and he's continued to be a great guy. He's going to end up benefiting from all this because first of all, he's probably going to wind up being traded somewhere great. Second of all, I think his legacy will sort of live on and people will know what a good person he is."
Trading Smith would free up $17 million in cap space for the Chiefs, a much-needed amount for a team currently projected to be over the cap next year, and would also allow them to replenish some of the draft picks they traded away in multiple trades in recent months. It cost a 2013 second round pick and a 2014 conditional pick (which turned out to be another second round pick) for the Chiefs to acquire Smith from the San Francisco 49ers in 2013, and Rapoport thinks the Chiefs could get even more in return for Smith than that.
"I think they might do better this time," Rapoport said. "He is a hot commodity, and they are in unbelievable position."
Originally Posted by Baby Lee:
That's between you and the poster who thinks you should.
Oh good, there's only one poster now!!! And all this time you had me convinced that I owed thousands of posters an apology!!! Whew!!!
Ok, so if you have any remaining fragments of a soul, then I think this may be the right time for you to apologize to the millions of non-posters.....for your awfulness. Come on, don't be a dick...apologize.
Originally Posted by rico:
Oh good, there's only one poster now!!! And all this time you had me convinced that I owed thousands of posters an apology!!! Whew!!!
Ok, so if you have any remaining fragments of a soul, then I think this may be the right time for you to apologize to the millions of non-posters.....for your awfulness. Come on, don't be a dick...apologize.
'One poster' told me that focusing on your [royal] antics was disrespectful to thousands on here who are more rational in their opinions. The opinion of the rest of them is hard to pin down due to their legendary reticence, but he assures me that he was speaking on their behalf.
Point is, your beef about that 'kick' is with him, not me. I'm just respecting his criticism. [Reply]
Originally Posted by rico:
And we can't forget about the THOUSANDS of rational people who lurk the boards, but don't post...(another kick that guy has been on).
That was me saying that to Baby Lee. He takes a handful of peoples opinions and attributes it to everyone else on the board.
There's really 3 main groups on the board.... Hate Alex above all, everything is his fault: group of less than 20/30 people. Love Alex above all, everything is everyone else's fault: group of less than 20/30 people. And then the rest of us. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mr. Plow:
That was me saying that to Baby Lee. He takes a handful of peoples opinions and attributes it to everyone else on the board.
There's really 3 main groups on the board.... Hate Alex above all, everything is his fault: group of less than 20/30 people. Love Alex above all, everything is everyone else's fault: group of less than 20/30 people. And then the rest of us.
And I apologize for representing 'the rest of us' so poorly and vocally. I admit I miscalculated our reticence for confrontation. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Baby Lee:
'One poster' told me that focusing on your [royal] antics was disrespectful to thousands on here who are more rational in their opinions. The opinion of the rest of them is hard to pin down due to their legendary reticence, but he assures me that he was speaking on their behalf.
Point is, your beef about that 'kick' is with him, not me. I'm just respecting his criticism.
It's crazy to me that there is actually a poster on this board (you) who takes Sandy's posts with anything more than a grain of salt. Wow... [Reply]
Originally Posted by Baby Lee:
And I apologize for representing 'the rest of us' so poorly and vocally. I admit I miscalculated our reticence for confrontation.
Originally Posted by rico:
It's crazy to me that there is actually a poster on this board (you) who takes Sandy's posts with anything more than a grain of salt. Wow...
WTF does Sandy have to do with anything? I haven't said a word positive or negative to or about Sandy, possibly ever. Certainly not in years, if at all. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Baby Lee:
WTF does Sandy have to do with anything? I haven't said a word positive or negative to or about Sandy, possibly ever. Certainly not in years, if at all.
He gotta lil crush on me, man.. don't worry bout it. :-) [Reply]
Originally Posted by Baby Lee:
WTF does Sandy have to do with anything? I haven't said a word positive or negative to or about Sandy, possibly ever. Certainly not in years, if at all.
Originally Posted by rico:
Ok, I apologize, I guessed wrong...
PAChiefsFan/Squirrel Tits?!?!
Jesus dude. Have a little awareness. The guy JUST told you who he was.
Originally Posted by Mr. Plow:
That was me saying that to Baby Lee. He takes a handful of peoples opinions and attributes it to everyone else on the board.
There's really 3 main groups on the board.... Hate Alex above all, everything is his fault: group of less than 20/30 people. Love Alex above all, everything is everyone else's fault: group of less than 20/30 people. And then the rest of us.
