Aaron is right.
[Reply]

It would be awesome if one of them leaked it.

It probably went over about as well as the "rent money" comments. Wealthy stars making millions preaching to guys just trying to get a few good years of a decent income stacked up doesn't seem to be well received.
[Reply]

They can reruns of last season
[Reply]

How can anyone side with the billionaire owners on this?

The players continue to get fucked.
[Reply]

The only ones "fucked" are the average Joe fans who are price gouged
[Reply]

In case you haven't noticed, this is no longer a dispute between the owners and the players. It has been exposed for what it's always been. The lunch pail guys getting next to nothing because of the greedy of the elite few demanding more money than they can spend in 5 lifetimes. Greedy Dak Prescott turned down $33 million per year. That is a big FU to the rest of his team. He's saying that he doesn't care if they get cut because of him being overpaid. Well, those guys have a voice now. They can't vote to approve this CBA and give a big FU back to Prescott and Rodgers and the rest of the greedy assholes who are taking more than their fair share of a $200 million cap and leaving crumbs for their teammates
[Reply]

I don't know about Dak, but if I was Watson. I would price my way out from the Texans & their love of O'Brein
[Reply]

Just sign the damn thing. Players won't get what they want and never will. Owners of the ranch own cattle. Players are their cattle.
[Reply]

😂😂 amazing. Players voice concerns about 17 games being the biggest reason they vote NO. So now the NFL leaks they want 18 games if this CBA proposal doesn’t pass. Take this deal players or get 18 games and less money in March 2021. https://t.co/irCm91RCA3

— Geoff Schwartz (@geoffschwartz) March 7, 2020

[Reply]

I think this was intentionally leaked by the NFL to put pressure on the players to approve the CBA.
[Reply]

While I like Dak the young man, Dak the QB is way to full of himself as far as his value.
[Reply]

How do the "cheap" players feel about 18 games?

Many of them are only in the league for ~3 years, so do they see it as being an opportunity for "one more check while it lasts" and a good thing? Obviously the big money guys would be a "hell no".
[Reply]

This sounds strange to focus on but I've never seen a professional send a centered-justified response in any legal correspondence.

Wonder if this is real or someone else copied and pasted this? :-)
[Reply]

No shit. The cheap players should all say yes.
[Reply]

I don't know, does each player vote, or is it just each team's representative that votes?
[Reply]