Originally Posted by Nickhead:
and who is the player?
I know that the losing teams in the Super Bowl get rings too. Is that second ring the one the Chiefs got after losing to Tampa Bay? Don't know who the player is. [Reply]
It's a little cheesy to me how much they pretend like every little thing is meaningful. I mean sure, it's cool that the 19 diamonds on the side represent 11 consecutive winning seasons and 8 consecutive AFCW titles, but there's zero chance they went into it with that in mind. Instead, they said "looks like about 19 diamonds are going to fit in there - what can that represent?" It's all a bit silly to me. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DaFace:
It's a little cheesy to me how much they pretend like every little thing is meaningful. I mean sure, it's cool that the 19 diamonds on the side represent 11 consecutive winning seasons and 8 consecutive AFCW titles, but there's zero chance they went into it with that in mind. Instead, they said "looks like about 19 diamonds are going to fit in there - what can that represent?" It's all a bit silly to me.
Yeah maybe spend a tad less energy there and a tad more on ensuring there are no major factual fuck ups.
All good, though. The “Threepest” ring will no doubt be the one ring to rule them all. At least until the fourpeat. [Reply]